Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27520988›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

A case report of a patient with metastatic ocular melanoma who experienced a response to treatment with the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib.

A Maleka, G Åström, P Byström, G J Ullenhag

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Conjunctival Metastasis of a Cutaneous Melanoma.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A MalekaDepartment of Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
G ÅströmDepartment of Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
P ByströmNovartis Sverige AB, Kemistvägen 1, 183 79, Täby, Sweden.
G J UllenhagDepartment of Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden. Gustav.Ullenhag@igp.uu.se.
Uppsala University Hospital · SENovartis (Sweden) · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConjunctival malignant melanoma (CMM) is a rare malignancy and in the advanced setting there is no effective treatment. In contrast, half of cutaneous melanomas have BRAF mutations and treatment with BRAF inhibitors is established for patients with disseminated disease. The most common form of ocular melanoma, uveal melanoma, lacks these mutations, however, their presence has been reported for CMM. CASE PRESENTATION: We used the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib to treat a 53 year-old female suffering from a BRAF(V600E) mutated metastatic CMM. The patient benefited from the treatment, a response was evident within a week and she experienced a progression free survival of four months.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first described case of response to vemurafenib treatment in a patient with ocular melanoma.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansIndolesMelanomaMiddle AgedMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSulfonamidesTreatment OutcomeUveal MelanomaUveal NeoplasmsVemurafenibAntineoplastic AgentsBRAF protein, humanIndolesProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSulfonamidesVemurafenibBRAF inhibitorBRAF mutationConjunctival malignant melanomaOcular melanomaVemurafenib

Identifiers

PMID27520988
PMCPMC4983009
OpenAlexW2507727777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.