Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27520027›Full record

ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2016

Development of an integrated approach for comparison of in vitro and in vivo responses to particulate matter.

Dalibor Breznan, Subramanian Karthikeyan, Marcelle Phaneuf, Prem Kumarathasan, Sabit Cakmak, Michael S Denison, Jeffrey R Brook, Renaud Vincent

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Predicting nanomaterials pulmonary toxicity in animals by cell culture models: Achievements and perspectives.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of Fine Particulate Matter onBioMed research international · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dalibor BreznanInhalation Toxicology Laboratory, Hazard Identification Division, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Subramanian KarthikeyanInhalation Toxicology Laboratory, Hazard Identification Division, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Marcelle PhaneufInhalation Toxicology Laboratory, Hazard Identification Division, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Prem KumarathasanAnalytical Biochemistry and Proteomics Laboratory, Mechanistic Studies Division, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sabit CakmakAir Health Effects Research, Population Studies Division, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Michael S DenisonDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Jeffrey R BrookProcesses Research Section, Air Quality Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Renaud VincentInhalation Toxicology Laboratory, Hazard Identification Division, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada. renaud.vincent@hc-sc.gc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssociation of particulate matter with adverse health effects has been established in epidemiological studies and animal experiments. Epidemiological studies are difficult to undertake while animal studies are impractical for high-throughput toxicity testing. The ease and rapidity of in vitro tests emphasizes their potential for use in risk assessment of chemicals and particles. We examined the association between in vitro and in vivo responses to ambient particles, to determine the potential of cell-based assays as standalone toxicity screening tools.

methodsAssays of cytotoxicity and key inflammatory mediators were applied to determine the in vitro biological potency of a panel of urban and mineral particles in J774A.1 macrophages and A549 lung epithelial cells. The particles were also screened for the presence of AhR agonists using the Ah receptor-dependent gene induction assay and for endotoxin using the Limulus amebocyte lysate assay. A subset of the particles with a contrasting in vitro toxicity profile was delivered intratracheally in BALB/c mice to assess their in vivo biological potency. Results from various bioassays were combined within the in vitro and in vivo models. The combined potency measures were examined for associations.

resultsOverall, J774A.1 cells were more sensitive to particle effects than A549 cells. Whereas the combined cytotoxicity estimates were highly correlated between the two cell lines, the combined in vitro inflammatory potency estimates were not, emphasizing functional differences of the two cell types. Secretion of inflammatory markers by J774A.1 cells was correlated with AhR ligand binding profile and endotoxin levels of particles. Particle instillation led to an acute toxicity response in BALB/c mice, with neutrophilia and release of inflammatory mediators. While the combined toxicity estimates were not correlated between in vitro and in vivo models, the combined inflammatory and integrated potency estimates (toxicity and inflammation) approached the threshold for significance (p = 0.052) in a correlation within in vitro and in vivo models, with a ranking of fine particle (DWR1), minerals (TiO2, CRI) and coarse particles (SRM-, EHC-type) from low to high potency.

conclusionIntegration of in vitro endpoints shows promise in determining adverse outcomes of particle exposures in vivo. The devised data reduction and computational approach will prove useful in the development of models for assessment of hazard potential of particles; however, distinct models may be needed for particles of different type, such as urban particles vs. mineral particles, nanomaterials.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineCytokinesHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CParticulate MatterCytokinesParticulate MatterAryl hydrocarbon receptorCorrelationCytotoxicityEndotoxinInflammationIn vitroIn vivoParticulate matter

Identifiers

PMID27520027
PMCPMC4983025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.