Trial reportBMJ open2016
HALON-hysterectomy by transabdominal laparoscopy or natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a randomised controlled trial (study protocol).
Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02631837 (Hysterectomy for Benign Gynaecological Disease by Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery or Laparoscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Hysterectomy for Benign Gynaecological Disease by Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery or Laparoscopy
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Surgical outcomes and postoperative sexual function after vNOTES versus TU-LESS ovarian cystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Single Centre Review of Hysterectomy by Abdominal Laparoscopy and Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026Article
- Transvaginal Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy vs. abdominal laparoscopic approach in real-life practices: a retrospective cohort study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- Ectopic pregnancies: laparoscopic versus vNOTES approach. Surgical and obstetric outcomes.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- Large uterus as a surgical challenge in robot-assisted vNOTES hysterectomy: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy and vNOTES hysterectomy in previous pelvic surgery: a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for tubal ectopic pregnancy(vNOTESTEP): a protocol for a randomized controlled trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Sexual Function After Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery and Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Posterior rectus fascia prolapse (PREFAP) repair: a new native tissue approach to pelvic organ prolapse via vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023Article
- Is transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) indicated in patients with previous extensive pelvic surgeries? A case report.Case reports in women's health · 2022Article
- Hysterectomy by Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery versus Transumbilical Laparoscopic Single-Site Surgery: A Single-Center Experience from East China.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Survey: acceptability of opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy in Flanders.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2021Article
- Hysterectomy and Adnexal Procedures by Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (VNH): Initial Findings From a Korean Surgeon.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Article
- Hysterectomy by vaginal-assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: Initial experience with twelve cases.Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2018Article
- Hysterectomy and ovarian cystectomy using natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: An initial experience at Tzu Chi General Hospital.Tzu chi medical journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNatural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) uses natural body orifices to access the cavities of the human body to perform surgery. NOTES limits the magnitude of surgical trauma and has the potential to reduce postoperative pain. This is the first randomised study in women bound to undergo hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease comparing NOTES with classical laparoscopy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: All women aged 18-70 years, regardless of parity, consulting at our practice with an indication for hysterectomy due to benign gynaecological disease will be eligible. After stratification according to uterine size on clinical examination, participants will be randomised to be treated by laparoscopy or by transvaginal NOTES. Participants will be evaluated on day 0, days 1-7 and at 3 and 6 months. The following data will be collected: the proportion of women successfully treated by removing the uterus by the intended approach as randomised; the proportion of women admitted to the inpatient hospital; postoperative pain scores measured twice daily by the women from day 1 to 7; the total amount of analgesics used from day 1 to 7; readmission during the first 6 weeks; presence and intensity of dyspareunia and sexual well-being at baseline, 3 and 6 months (Short Sexual Functioning Scale (SSFS) scale); duration of surgery; postoperative infection or other surgical complications; direct and indirect costs incurred up to 6 weeks following surgery. The primary outcome will be the proportion of women successfully treated by the intended technique; all other outcomes are secondary. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved on 1 December 2015 by the Ethics Committee of the Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium. The first patient was randomised on 17 December 2015. The last participant randomised should be treated before 30 November 2017. The results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific meetings within 4 years after starting recruitment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02631837; Pre-results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.