ArticleBMC infectious diseases2016
Evaluation of impact of measles rubella campaign on vaccination coverage and routine immunization services in Bangladesh.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of measles vaccination strategies on vaccination rates in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ global health · 2025Pooled it
- Behavioral interventions for vaccination uptake: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Impact of behavioral insights-informed social media campaigns on HPV vaccination in Bangladesh.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Rubella Seropositivity and Associated Factors Among Young Female Adults in Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Post-campaign coverage evaluation of a measles and rubella supplementary immunization activity in five districts in India, 2019-2020.PloS one · 2024Article
- Pervasive Parental Hesitancy and Resistance towards Measles Rubella Vaccination in Jordan.Vaccines · 2023Article
- Article
- Overcoming Vaccine Hesitancy for Future COVID-19 and HIV Vaccines: Lessons from Measles and HPV Vaccines.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2022Review
- An innovative approach in monitoring oral cholera vaccination campaign: integration of a between-round survey.BMC public health · 2022Article
- The Impact of a Single Educational Lecture on the Vaccine Confidence among Pregnant Women and Young Mothers.Vaccines · 2021Article
- HPV Vaccination in Bangladesh: Ethical Views.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2021Article
- Implementation of the World's largest measles-rubella mass vaccination campaign in Bangladesh: a process evaluation.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Coverage, Timelines, and Determinants of Incomplete Immunization in Bangladesh.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2018Article
- Ethical issues related to human papillomavirus vaccination programs: an example from Bangladesh.BMC medical ethics · 2018Review
- Impact of measles supplementary immunisation activities on utilisation of maternal and child health services in low-income and middle-income countries.BMJ global health · 2018Article
- Meningococcal serogroup B vaccine: Knowledge and acceptability among parents in Italy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2017Article
- Article
- Influence of Sociodemographic Factors in Measles-Rubella Campaign Compared with Routine Immunization at Mysore City.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social MedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLike other countries in Asia, measles-rubella (MR) vaccine coverage in Bangladesh is suboptimal whereas 90-95 % coverage is needed for elimination of these diseases. The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW) of the Government of Bangladesh implemented MR campaign in January-February 2014 to increase MR vaccination coverage. Strategically, the MOHFW used both routine immunization centres and educational institutions for providing vaccine to the children aged 9 months to <15 years. The evaluation was carried out to assess the impact of the campaign on MR vaccination and routine immunization services.
methodsBoth quantitative and qualitative evaluations were done before and after implementation of the campaign. Quantitative data were presented with mean (standard deviation, SD) for continuous variables and with proportion for categorical variables. The overall and age- and sex-specific coverage rates were calculated for each region and then combined. Categorical variables were compared by chi-square statistics. Multiple logistic regression analysis were performed to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) of coverage associated with covariates, with adjustment for other covariates. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis.
resultsThe evaluations found MR coverage was very low (<13 %) before the campaign and it rose to 90 % after the campaign. The pre-post campaign difference in MR coverage in each stratum was highly significant (p < 0.001). The campaign achieved high coverage despite relatively low level (23 %) of interpersonal communication with caregivers through registration process. Child registration was associated with higher MR coverage (OR 2.91, 95 % CI 1.91-4.44). Children who attended school were more likely to be vaccinated (OR 8.97, 95 % CI 6.17-13.04) compared to those who did not attend school. Children of caregivers with primary or secondary or higher education had higher coverage compared to children of caregivers with no formal education. Most caregivers mentioned contribution of the campaign in vaccination for the children not previously vaccinated.
conclusionsThe results of the evaluation indicated that the campaign was successful in terms of improving MR coverage and routine immunization services. The evaluation provided an important guideline for future evaluation of similar efforts in Bangladesh and elsewhere.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.