ArticleClinical drug investigation1995
Cefepime : The Last Generation or the First Enhanced-Potency Broad Spectrum Cephalosporin?
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cefepime and 8 other β-lactam antibiotics were compared with regard to in vitro activity against 134 clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacteria resistant to β-lactam antibiotics by a variety of mechanisms. Overall, cefepime was the most active cephalosporin tested, inhibiting 104 of 112 (93%) strains of Enterobacteriaceae and 12 of 22 (55%) strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa at concentrations of 8 mg/L or less. In contrast, ceftazidime inhibited only 64 (57%) of the Enterobacteriaceae and 11 (50%) of the P. aeruginosa strains. Imipenem was the most active β-lactam agent tested, although some strains resistant to the carbapenem were susceptible to cefepime. Cefepime was less likely than ceftazidime to select mutants from organisms possessing inducible Bush Group 1 β-lactamases. Of 19 mutants selected by various cephalosporins, 18 (95%) remained susceptible to cefepime, whereas only 6 (32%) were susceptible to ceftazidime. These findings suggest that cefepime possesses enhanced activity compared with other cephalosporins, and this may result from its improved penetration into the Gram-negative cell and the lower affinity of β-lactamases for the drug.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.