Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27519287›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2017

T

Temel Tirkes, Chen Lin, Evan L Fogel, Stuart S Sherman, Qiushi Wang, Kumaresan Sandrasegaran

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Abdominal TMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. T1 Mapping of the Abdomen, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Whole pancreas water TMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Advances in MRI of Chronic Pancreatitis.Advances in clinical radiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Cross-sectional imaging of the pancreas in diabetes.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Temel TirkesDepartment of Radiology and Clinical Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Chen LinDepartment of Radiology and Clinical Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Evan L FogelDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Stuart S ShermanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Qiushi WangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences No 106, Guangzhou, GuangDong, China.
Kumaresan SandrasegaranDepartment of Radiology and Clinical Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Indiana University School of MedicineGuangdong General Hospital · CNIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

Indiana University (IU) Clinical Center for Chronic Pancreatitis Clinical Research NetworkU01DK108323 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Jeffrey James Easler, Evan L Fogel · 2015 to 2026
$6.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK108323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine if the T MATERIALS AND

methodsThis Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant retrospective study analyzed 98 patients with suspected mild CP. Patients were grouped as normal (n = 53) or mild CP (n = 45) based on history, presenting symptomatology, and concordant findings on both the secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). T

resultsThere was a significant difference (P < 0.0001) in the T

conclusionThe T LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:1171-1176.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedPancreasPancreatitis, ChronicRetrospective StudiesSecretinYoung AdultSecretinchronic pancreatitisMRCPMRIT1 mapping

Identifiers

PMID27519287
PMCPMC5542575
OpenAlexW2523185157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.