Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27519278›Full record

Trial reportBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2016

Sirolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil as Calcineurin Inhibitor-Free Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis for Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation.

Nelli Bejanyan, John Rogosheske, Todd E DeFor, Aleksandr Lazaryan, Mukta Arora, Shernan G Holtan, Pamala A Jacobson, Margaret L MacMillan, Michael R Verneris, Bruce R Blazar and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Current Status and Future Directions in Graft-Clinical hematology international · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nelli BejanyanHematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Electronic address: nbejanya@umn.edu.
John RogosheskeExperimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Todd E DeForAdult and Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Aleksandr LazaryanHematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Mukta AroraHematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Shernan G HoltanHematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Pamala A JacobsonExperimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Margaret L MacMillanBlood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Michael R VernerisBlood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Bruce R BlazarBlood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Daniel J WeisdorfHematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
John E WagnerBlood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Claudio G BrunsteinHematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Jeffrey S. Miller · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
Trial Design and Biostatistical Support CoreP01CA065493 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI J SUNIL RAO · 1995 to 2026
$48.2M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCI NIH HHS P01 CA065493NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to reduce the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) requires intensive post-transplantation toxicity monitoring. Sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis is associated with a favorable toxicity profile and requires less intensive monitoring. However, the efficacy of sirolimus-based regimen compared with CNI-based regimen has not been evaluated in the setting of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) double umbilical cord blood (UCB) HCT. We compared outcomes of patients receiving sirolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n = 37) or cyclosporine (CSA)/MMF (n = 123) in an ongoing phase II study of RIC UCB transplantation. In multiple regression analysis, sirolimus/MMF did not influence the risk of grades II to IV or grades III and IV acute GVHD. In addition, there was no association between type of GVHD prophylaxis and hematopoietic engraftment. Infection density analysis found a significantly lower risk of infections with sirolimus/MMF between days +46 and +180 after HCT compared with CSA/MMF (3.4 versus 6.3 per 1000 patient-days, P = .03); however, no difference was observed before day +45. Sirolimus/MMF use resulted in no thrombotic microangiopathy, fewer instances of elevated serum creatinine >2 mg/dL (14% versus 45%; P <.01), and similar rates of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (2.7% versus 4%; P = .68), compared with CSA/MMF. Disease-free survival at 1 year was 51% for sirolimus/MMF and 41% for CSA/MMF (P = .41), and sirolimus/MMF use did not influence the risk of nonrelapse mortality or survival. In conclusion, sirolimus/MMF GVHD prophylaxis was better tolerated and resulted in similar rates of GVHD and survival as compared to CSA/MMF after RIC double UCB transplantation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCalcineurin InhibitorsCord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationCyclosporineFemaleGraft SurvivalGraft vs Host DiseaseHematologic NeoplasmsHumansInfectionsMaleMiddle AgedMycophenolic AcidPremedicationSirolimusCalcineurin InhibitorsCyclosporineMycophenolic AcidSirolimusCyclosporineDouble umbilical cord bloodGraft-versus-host diseaseReduced-intensity conditioningSirolimusTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID27519278
PMCPMC5067231
OpenAlexW2519540864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.