Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27519264›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Regulatory complexity revealed by integrated cytological and RNA-seq analyses of meiotic substages in mouse spermatocytes.

Robyn L Ball, Yasuhiro Fujiwara, Fengyun Sun, Jianjun Hu, Matthew A Hibbs, Mary Ann Handel, Gregory W Carter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Unusual RNA polymerase II patterns in meiotic prophase I inTurkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Application of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing in Mammalian Meiosis Studies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  13. Transcriptomics of Meiosis in the Male Mouse.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genomic Structure ofGenetics · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robyn L BallThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Yasuhiro FujiwaraThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Fengyun SunThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Jianjun HuThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Matthew A HibbsThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Mary Ann HandelThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA. maryann.handel@jax.org.
Gregory W CarterThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA. greg.carter@jax.org.

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI William Carl Skarnes · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
PRDM9 and Meiotic Regulatory NetworksP01GM099640 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI PAIGEN, KENNETH · 2013 to 2017
$8.2M
CELL CYCLE REGULATION DURING SPERMATOGENESISR01HD033816 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI HANDEL, MARY ANN · 1996 to 2016
$4.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD033816NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM099640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe continuous and non-synchronous nature of postnatal male germ-cell development has impeded stage-specific resolution of molecular events of mammalian meiotic prophase in the testis. Here the juvenile onset of spermatogenesis in mice is analyzed by combining cytological and transcriptomic data in a novel computational analysis that allows decomposition of the transcriptional programs of spermatogonia and meiotic prophase substages.

resultsGerm cells from testes of individual mice were obtained at two-day intervals from 8 to 18 days post-partum (dpp), prepared as surface-spread chromatin and immunolabeled for meiotic stage-specific protein markers (STRA8, SYCP3, phosphorylated H2AFX, and HISTH1T). Eight stages were discriminated cytologically by combinatorial antibody labeling, and RNA-seq was performed on the same samples. Independent principal component analyses of cytological and transcriptomic data yielded similar patterns for both data types, providing strong evidence for substage-specific gene expression signatures. A novel permutation-based maximum covariance analysis (PMCA) was developed to map co-expressed transcripts to one or more of the eight meiotic prophase substages, thereby linking distinct molecular programs to cytologically defined cell states. Expression of meiosis-specific genes is not substage-limited, suggesting regulation of substage transitions at other levels.

conclusionsThis integrated analysis provides a general method for resolving complex cell populations. Here it revealed not only features of meiotic substage-specific gene expression, but also a network of substage-specific transcription factors and relationships to potential target genes.

Indexed as

MeiosisAnimalsCells, CulturedChromatinGene Regulatory NetworksGerm CellsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPrincipal Component AnalysisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNASequence Analysis, RNASpermatocytesSpermatogenesisTestisChromatinRNATranscription FactorsMaximum covariance analysisMeiosisMouseRNA-seqSpermatogenesisTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID27519264
PMCPMC4983049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.