Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27519172›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular ultrasound2016

Echocardiographic diagnosis of the different phenotypes of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Vito Maurizio Parato, Valeria Antoncecchi, Fabiola Sozzi, Stefania Marazia, Annapaola Zito, Maria Maiello, Pasquale Palmiero, Italian Chapter of ISCU

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular ultrasound, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bedside cardiac ultrasound evaluation of a young male with chest pain.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Feline Cardiomyopathies: 2. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vito Maurizio ParatoCardiology Unit and EchoLab of Emergency Department, Madonna del Soccorso Hospital, Politecnica delle Marche University, 3-7, Via Manara, San Benedetto del Tronto-Ascoli Piceno, 63074, Italy. vitomaurizio.parato@sanita.marche.it.
Valeria AntoncecchiCardiology Unit, Sarcone Hospital, Terlizzi, Bari, Italy.
Fabiola SozziCardiology Unit, University Policlinico Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Stefania MaraziaCardiology Unit, Giannuzzi Hospital, Manduria, Italy.
Annapaola ZitoCardiovascular Diseases Section, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation (DETO), University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Maria MaielloASL BR, Health Center, Districtual Cardiology, Brindisi, Italy.
Pasquale PalmieroASL BR, Health Center, Districtual Cardiology, Brindisi, Italy.
Italian Chapter of ISCU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an inherited cardiovascular disorder of great genetic heterogeneity and has a prevalence of 0.1 - 0.2 % in the general population. Several hundred mutations in more than 27 genes, most of which encode sarcomeric structures, are associated with the HCM phenotype. Then, HCM is an extremely heterogeneous disease and several phenotypes have been described over the years. Originally only two phenotypes were considered, a more common, obstructive type (HOCM, 70 %) and a less common, non-obstructive type (HNCM, 30 %) (Maron BJ, et al. Am J Cardiol 48:418 -28, 1981). Wigle et al. (Circ 92:1680-92, 1995) considered three types of functional phenotypes: subaortic obstruction, midventricular obstruction and cavity obliteration. A leader american working group suggested that HCM should be defined genetically and not morphologically (Maron BJ, et al. Circ 113:1807-16, 2006). The European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases recommended otherwise a morphological classification (Elliott P, et al. Eur Heart J 29:270-6, 2008). Echocardiography is still the principal tool for the diagnosis, prognosis and clinical management of HCM. It is well known that the echocardiographic picture may have a clinical and prognostic impact. For this reason, in this article, we summarize the state of the art regarding the echocardiographic pattern of the HCM phenotypes and its impact on clinical course and prognosis.

Indexed as

Cardiomyopathy, HypertrophicEchocardiographyHumansPhenotypePrognosisCardiomiopathyEchocardiographyHypertrophy

Identifiers

PMID27519172
PMCPMC4982201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.