Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27519055›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Gender Associated with the Intention to Choose a Medical Specialty in Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in 11 Countries in Latin America.

Luis Fernando Ng-Sueng, Iván Vargas-Matos, Percy Mayta-Tristán, Reneé Pereyra-Elías, Juan José Montenegro-Idrogo, Fiorella Inga-Berrospi, Felix Ancalli, Francisco Bonilla-Escobar, Cristian Diaz-Velez, Erick Gutierrez-Quezada and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Analysis of Authorship in Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery: Women Remain Underrepresented.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Luis Fernando Ng-SuengEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, PerúORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9835-2669
Iván Vargas-MatosEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Perú
Percy Mayta-TristánEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Perú
Reneé Pereyra-ElíasEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Perú
Juan José Montenegro-IdrogoUniversidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú
Fiorella Inga-BerrospiUniversidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú
Felix AncalliUniversidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann, Tacna, Perú
Francisco Bonilla-EscobarInstituto Cisalva, Escuela de Salud Pública, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Cristian Diaz-VelezUniversidad de San Martín de Porres, Chiclayo, Perú
Erick Gutierrez-QuezadaUniversidad Autónoma de Nayarit, Tepic, Nayarit, México.
Jennifer Gomez-AlhachUniversidad de San Martín de Cali, Cali, Colombia.
Carlos E Muñoz-MedinaUniversidad del Oriente Núcleo Bolivar, Ciudad Bolivar, Venezuela.
Adriana Sanchez-PozoUniversidad Nuestra Señora de La Paz, La Paz, Bolivia.
Milisen VidalUniversidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
Red LIRHUS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe selection of a medical specialty has been associated with multiple factors, such as personal preferences, academic exposure, motivational factors and sociodemographic factors, such as gender. The number of women in the medical field has increased in recent years. In Latin America, we have not found any studies that explore this relationship.

objectiveTo determine whether there is an association between gender and the intention to choose a medical specialty in medical students from 11 countries in Latin America.

methodsSecondary analysis of the Collaborative Working Group for the Research of Human Resources for Health (Red-LIRHUS) data; a multi-country project of students in their first year and fifth year of study, from 63 medical schools in 11 Latin American countries. All students who referred intention to choose a certain medical specialty were considered as participants.

resultsOf the 11073 surveyed students, 9235 indicated the name of a specific specialty. The specialties chosen most often in the fifth year were General Surgery (13.0%), Pediatrics (11.0%), Internal Medicine (10.3%) and Obstetrics/Gynecology (9.0%). For women, the top choices were Pediatrics (15.8%), Obstetrics/Gynecology (11.0%), Cardiology (8.7%), General Surgery (8.6%), and Oncology (6.4%). In the adjusted analysis, the female gender was associated with the choice of Obstetrics/Gynecology (RP: 2.75; IC95%: 2.24-3.39); Pediatric Surgery (RP: 2.19; IC95%: 1.19-4.00), Dermatology (RP: 1.91; IC95%:1.24-2.93), Pediatrics (RP: 1.83; IC95%: 1.56-2.17), and Oncology (RP: 1.37; IC95%: 1.10-1.71).

conclusionsThere is an association between the female gender and the intention to choose Obstetrics/Gynecology, Pediatrics, Pediatric Surgery, Dermatology, and Oncology. We recommend conducting studies that consider other factors that can influence the choice of a medical specialty.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceIntentionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLatin AmericaMaleMedicineSex FactorsStudents, MedicalYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27519055
PMCPMC4982605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.