Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27518789›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2016

[Guideline adherence - is more always better?].

M J Nothacker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M J NothackerAMWF-Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement (AWMF-IMWi), Fachbereich Medizin der Philipps-Universität Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 1, 35043, Marburg, Deutschland. nothacker@awmf.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guidelines play an increasing role in the health system. Guidelines are intended to provide guidance in the sense of ‟corridors for action and decision", whereby in certain justified cases actions can - or even must - deviate from them. "Cookbook medicine" is not the aim of guidelines.Guideline adherence can not necessarily be equated with guideline conformity. Adherence presumes an agreed treatment goal between patient and physician and focuses the behavior of the patient. Based on current studies on guideline adherence, the use of the term in studies on urological tumors is analyzed.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingDecision MakingGermanyGuideline AdherenceHumansMedical OncologyPatient Care PlanningPatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality ImprovementUrologic NeoplasmsUrologyDecision making, sharedImplementationQuality assessmentTreatment targetUrologic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27518789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.