Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27518729›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Imaging Characteristics of Driver Mutations in EGFR, KRAS, and ALK among Treatment-Naïve Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Jangchul Park, Yoshihisa Kobayashi, Kevin Y Urayama, Hidekazu Yamaura, Yasushi Yatabe, Toyoaki Hida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Enhancing the prediction ofTranslational lung cancer research · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Multi-channel multi-task deep learning for predictingQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Keratin 17 is an imaging biomarker in lung cancers.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020
    Article
  17. Imaging Features and Metastatic Patterns of AdvancedAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jangchul ParkDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoshihisa KobayashiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Kevin Y UrayamaDepartment of Human Genetics and Disease Diversity, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidekazu YamauraDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yasushi YatabeDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Toyoaki HidaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Aichi Cancer Center · JPKindai University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the computed tomography characteristics of treatment-naïve patients with lung adenocarcinoma and known driver mutations in EGFR, KRAS, or ALK. Patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma (stage IIIB-IV) and known mutations in EGFR, KRAS, or ALK were assessed. The radiological findings for the main tumor and intra-thoracic status were retrospectively analyzed in each group, and the groups' characteristics were compared. We identified 265 treatment-naïve patients with non-small-cell carcinoma, who had EGFR mutations (n = 159), KRAS mutations (n = 55), or ALK rearrangements (n = 51). Among the three groups, we evaluated only patients with stage IIIB-IV lung adenocarcinoma who had EGFR mutations (n = 126), KRAS mutations (n = 35), or ALK rearrangements (n = 47). We found that ground-glass opacity at the main tumor was significantly more common among EGFR-positive patients, compared to ALK-positive patients (p = 0.009). Lymphadenopathy was significantly more common among ALK-positive patients, compared to EGFR-positive patients (p = 0.003). Extranodal invasion was significantly more common among ALK-positive patients, compared to EGFR-positive patients and KRAS-positive patients (p = 0.001 and p = 0.049, respectively). Lymphangitis was significantly more common among ALK-positive patients, compared to EGFR-positive patients (p = 0.049). Pleural effusion was significantly less common among KRAS-positive patients, compared to EGFR-positive patients and ALK-positive patients (p = 0.046 and p = 0.026, respectively). Lung metastases were significantly more common among EGFR-positive patients, compared to KRAS-positive patients and ALK-positive patients (p = 0.007 and p = 0.04, respectively). In conclusion, EGFR mutations were associated with ground-glass opacity, KRAS-positive tumors were generally solid and less likely to metastasize to the lung and pleura, and ALK-positive tumors tended to present with lymphadenopathy, extranodal invasion, and lymphangitis. These mutation-specific imaging characteristics may be related to the biological differences between these cancers.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseCarcinoma, Large CellCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellErbB ReceptorsFemaleGene RearrangementHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedALK protein, humanAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID27518729
PMCPMC4982673
OpenAlexW2508148629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.