ArticleDer Orthopade2016
[Incidence of knee injuries : Numbers for outpatient and inpatient care in Germany].
Article in Der Orthopade, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physiotherapeutic care of patients with rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament or meniscus lesion in Germany.Research in health services & regions · 2026Article
- A Novel Sensor-Based Application for Home-Based Rehabilitation Can Objectively Measure Postoperative Outcomes following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Sensor-based telerehabilitation system increases patient adherence after knee surgery.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
- Post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis; the role of inflammation and hemarthrosis on disease progression.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- [Relevance of meniscus loss for the progression of osteoarthritis and treatment options for early arthritis].Der Orthopade · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMusculoskeletal illnesses and injuries are among the most common ailments in the Federal Republic of Germany. In 2008 they generated costs of nearly 29 billion euros. Figures about their incidence and prevalence are necessary for a demand-oriented planning of future patient-centred care.
methodPseudonymised data of 3.8 million people insured by AOK Baden-Württemberg between 2008 and 2013 were evaluated. The diagnoses were assigned to nine injury groups. For outpatient care confirmed diagnoses were considered, and for inpatient care both primary and secondary diagnoses were considered. For all patients with structural knee injuries, it was evaluated whether they made use of one of five eligible treatment paradigms either in the quarter in which they were injured or in the following quarter.
results418,257 patients were treated in 2013 for at least one new-onset injury (10.9 % of all insurees); 86,783 insurees (2.3 % of all insurees) had a newly occurring knee injury. The vast majority of the patients were treated by specialist doctors. While magnetic resonance imaging clearly increased during the observation period, the incidence of surgical therapy did not change. Striking are the different age distributions regarding the types of injuries, with a high injury incidence amongst young men and a significant increase in injuries between 2008 and 2013, especially amongst women.
conclusionFor the first time, the data quantify the knee injury incidences of a large cohort in Germany. They show which inpatient and outpatient health care services have been claimed and that an age- and gender-adapted prevention and an increased awareness are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27518117What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.