ArticlePediatric radiology2016
The role of MR imaging in investigating isolated pediatric nystagmus.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of MRI in isolated pediatric nystagmus remains a gray area in clinical management. Many clinicians prefer to order an MRI to rule out intracranial pathology despite the lack of clinically significant findings in most cases.
objectiveTo assess the yield of MR imaging in isolated pediatric nystagmus and define a management algorithm to minimize avoidable MRI referrals and streamline MRI protocols. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe reviewed the charts of 148 children who underwent neuro MRI for isolated nystagmus between January 2008 and September 2014. We noted nystagmus onset and clinical characteristics and compared them with the MRI features and visual electrophysiology results.
resultsWe included 85 boys and 63 girls (total 148, average age at MRI 4.24 ± 4.19 years). Twenty-three (15.5%) children had abnormal intracranial findings on MRI including abnormal signal lesions (4.1%; n=6), Chiari I malformations (3.4%; n=5) and optic pathway glioma (2.0%; n=3). The time of onset of nystagmus was not associated with an abnormal MRI (P=0.2). Seventy children underwent visual electrophysiology testing but this test could not predict abnormality at MRI, either (P=0.12).
conclusionAmong children with isolated nystagmus, 15.5% had abnormalities on neuroimaging. Neither clinical characteristics of nystagmus nor the visual electrophysiology results allowed prediction of intracranial pathology. We were unable to formulate a management algorithm for the optimal sequence of investigations (MRI preceding visual electrophysiology or vice versa), but we discuss the use of gadolinium contrast agent and orbital sequences in isolated pediatric nystagmus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.