Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27517840›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2016

SPECT and PET imaging of angiogenesis and arteriogenesis in pre-clinical models of myocardial ischemia and peripheral vascular disease.

Geert Hendrikx, Stefan Vöö, Matthias Bauwens, Mark J Post, Felix M Mottaghy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Emerging Photoacoustic Imaging Techniques for Peripheral Arterial Disease.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Mouse Cardiovascular Imaging.Current protocols · 2024
    Review
  4. Preclinical evaluation ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of a NewCells · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. [Cells · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Molecular Imaging of the Heart.Comprehensive Physiology · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Geert HendrikxDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Postbox 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Stefan VööDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Postbox 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Matthias BauwensDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Postbox 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Mark J PostDepartment of Physiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Felix M MottaghyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Postbox 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. fmottaghy@ukaachen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe extent of neovascularization determines the clinical outcome of coronary artery disease and other occlusive cardiovascular disorders. Monitoring of neovascularization is therefore highly important. This review article will elaborately discuss preclinical studies aimed at validating new nuclear angiogenesis and arteriogenesis tracers. Additionally, we will briefly address possible obstacles that should be considered when designing an arteriogenesis radiotracer.

methodsA structured medline search was the base of this review, which gives an overview on different radiopharmaceuticals that have been evaluated in preclinical models.

resultsNeovascularization is a collective term used to indicate different processes such as angiogenesis and arteriogenesis. However, while it is assumed that sensitive detection through nuclear imaging will facilitate translation of successful therapeutic interventions in preclinical models to the bedside, we still lack specific tracers for neovascularization imaging. Most nuclear imaging research to date has focused on angiogenesis, leaving nuclear arteriogenesis imaging largely overlooked.

conclusionAlthough angiogenesis is the process which is best understood, there is no scarcity in theoretical targets for arteriogenesis imaging.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiac Imaging TechniquesDisease Models, AnimalImage EnhancementMyocardial IschemiaNeovascularization, PathologicPerfusion ImagingPeripheral Arterial DiseasePositron-Emission TomographyReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAngiogenesisArteriogenesisMyocardial infarctionPeripheral vascular diseaseRadiotracer imaging

Identifiers

PMID27517840
PMCPMC5095166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.