Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27517341›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in obstetrics & gynecology2016

Exploring the basic science of prolapse meshes.

Rui Liang, Katrina Knight, Steve Abramowitch, Pamela A Moalli

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07414849 (The Amper Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07414849 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Amper Study: Amniotic Membrane for the Prevention of Mesh Exposure in Vaginal Reconstructive Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital General de Agudos J. M. PennaRan2026 to 2028Enrolled330ConditionsPelvic Organ Prolapse Vaginal Surgery, Stress Urinary Incontinence in WomenArmsSacrospinous Hysteropexy with Mesh, Retropubic Mid-urethral Sling (Bottom-Up), Transobturator Mid-urethral Sling (Out-In)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rui LiangaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine bDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Katrina Knight
Steve Abramowitch
Pamela A Moalli

Funding

Porosity and tensioning: Critical factors to consider when choosing a prolapse meshR01HD083383 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ABRAMOWITCH, STEVEN D, MOALLI, PAMELA A. · 2016 to 2025
$5.5M
Comprehensive Evaluation of Prolapse Meshes by an Interdisciplinary Research TeamR01HD061811 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI MOALLI, PAMELA A. · 2009 to 2013
$2.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061811NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPolypropylene mesh has been widely used in the surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse. However, low but persistent rates of complications related to mesh, most commonly mesh exposure and pain, have hampered its use. Complications are higher following transvaginal implantation prompting the Food and Drug Administration to release two public health notifications warning of complications associated with transvaginal mesh use (PHN 2008 and 2011) and to upclassify transvaginal prolapse meshes from Class II to Class III devices. Although there have been numerous studies to determine the incidence and management of mesh complications as well as impact on quality of life, few studies have focused on mechanisms. RECENT

findingsIn this review, we summarize the current understanding of how mesh textile properties and mechanical behavior impact vaginal structure and function, as well as the local immune response. We also discuss how mesh properties change in response to loading. SUMMARY: We highlight a few areas of current and future research to emphasize collaborative strategies that incorporate basic science research to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansPelvic Organ ProlapsePolypropylenesProstheses and ImplantsQuality of LifeStress, MechanicalSurgical MeshTextilesVaginaPolypropylenes

Identifiers

PMID27517341
PMCPMC5161092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.