Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27516874›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2016

Dynamic egg color mimicry.

Daniel Hanley, Michal Šulc, Patricia L R Brennan, Mark E Hauber, Tomáš Grim, Marcel Honza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Avian egg and nestling detection in the wild: should we rely on visual models or behavioural experiments?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Variation in multicomponent recognition cues alters egg rejection decisions: a test of the optimal acceptance threshold hypothesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel HanleyDepartment of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology Palacký University 17. listopadu 50 Olomouc 771 46 Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0523-4335
Michal ŠulcInstitute of Vertebrate Biology Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republicv. v. i., Květná 8603 65 Brno Czech Republic; Department of Ecology Faculty of Science Charles University in Prague Viničná 7128 44 Prague 2 Czech Republic.
Patricia L R BrennanDepartment of Biological Sciences Mount Holyoke College South Hadley Massachusetts 01074 USA; Organismic & Evolutionary Biology Graduate Program University of Massachusetts, Amherst Amherst Massachusetts 01003 USA.
Mark E HauberDepartment of Psychology Hunter College and the Graduate Center The City University of New York 695 Park Avenue New York City New York 10065 USA.
Tomáš GrimDepartment of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology Palacký University 17. listopadu 50 Olomouc 771 46 Czech Republic.
Marcel HonzaInstitute of Vertebrate Biology Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic v. v. i., Květná 8 603 65 Brno Czech Republic.
Palacký University Olomouc · CZCharles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology · CZMount Holyoke College · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary hypotheses regarding the function of eggshell phenotypes, from solar protection through mimicry, have implicitly assumed that eggshell appearance remains static throughout the laying and incubation periods. However, recent research demonstrates that egg coloration changes over relatively short, biologically relevant timescales. Here, we provide the first evidence that such changes impact brood parasite-host eggshell color mimicry during the incubation stage. First, we use long-term data to establish how rapidly the Acrocephalus arundinaceus Linnaeus (great reed warbler) responded to natural parasitic eggs laid by the Cuculus canorus Linnaeus (common cuckoo). Most hosts rejected parasitic eggs just prior to clutch completion, but the host response period extended well into incubation (~10 days after clutch completion). Using reflectance spectrometry and visual modeling, we demonstrate that eggshell coloration in the great reed warbler and its brood parasite, the common cuckoo, changes rapidly, and the extent of eggshell color mimicry shifts dynamically over the host response period. Specifically, 4 days after being laid, the host should notice achromatic color changes to both cuckoo and warbler eggs, while chromatic color changes would be noticeable after 8 days. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the perceived match between host and cuckoo eggshell color worsened over the incubation period. These findings have important implications for parasite-host coevolution dynamics, because host egg discrimination may be aided by disparate temporal color changes in host and parasite eggs.

Indexed as

Avian visionbrood parasitismcoevolutioncommon cuckoomimicrypigments

Identifiers

PMID27516874
PMCPMC4972242
OpenAlexW2396245460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.