Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27516732›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2016

Bootstrap Enhanced Penalized Regression for Variable Selection with Neuroimaging Data.

Samantha V Abram, Nathaniel E Helwig, Craig A Moodie, Colin G DeYoung, Angus W MacDonald, Niels G Waller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tumor response prediction inEJNMMI physics · 2020
    Article
  16. Immune activity at birth and later psychopathology in childhood.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samantha V AbramDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nathaniel E HelwigDepartment of Psychology, University of MinnesotaMinneapolis, MN, USA; School of Statistics, University of MinnesotaMinneapolis, MN, USA.
Craig A MoodieDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University Stanford, CA, USA.
Colin G DeYoungDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Angus W MacDonaldDepartment of Psychology, University of MinnesotaMinneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of MinnesotaMinneapolis, MN, USA.
Niels G WallerDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Neural and genetic mechanisms of cognition in externalizing behavior.R03DA029177 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI DEYOUNG, COLIN G · 2011 to 2011
$227k
NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA029177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in fMRI research highlight the use of multivariate methods for examining whole-brain connectivity. Complementary data-driven methods are needed for determining the subset of predictors related to individual differences. Although commonly used for this purpose, ordinary least squares (OLS) regression may not be ideal due to multi-collinearity and over-fitting issues. Penalized regression is a promising and underutilized alternative to OLS regression. In this paper, we propose a nonparametric bootstrap quantile (QNT) approach for variable selection with neuroimaging data. We use real and simulated data, as well as annotated R code, to demonstrate the benefits of our proposed method. Our results illustrate the practical potential of our proposed bootstrap QNT approach. Our real data example demonstrates how our method can be used to relate individual differences in neural network connectivity with an externalizing personality measure. Also, our simulation results reveal that the QNT method is effective under a variety of data conditions. Penalized regression yields more stable estimates and sparser models than OLS regression in situations with large numbers of highly correlated neural predictors. Our results demonstrate that penalized regression is a promising method for examining associations between neural predictors and clinically relevant traits or behaviors. These findings have important implications for the growing field of functional connectivity research, where multivariate methods produce numerous, highly correlated brain networks.

Indexed as

bootstrapfMRIfunctional connectivityindependent component analysisindividual differencespenalized regression

Identifiers

PMID27516732
PMCPMC4964314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.