Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27516357›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2017

Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior mediastinum: inter-observer reproducibility of five different methods of region-of-interest positioning.

Adriano Massimiliano Priola, Sandro Massimo Priola, Daniela Parlatano, Dario Gned, Maria Teresa Giraudo, Roberto Giardino, Bruno Ferrero, Francesco Ardissone, Andrea Veltri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adriano Massimiliano PriolaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Torino, Italy. adriano.priola@inwind.it.
Sandro Massimo PriolaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Torino, Italy.
Daniela ParlatanoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Torino, Italy.
Dario GnedDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Torino, Italy.
Maria Teresa GiraudoDepartment of Mathematics "Giuseppe Peano", University of Torino, Via Carlo Alberto 10, 10123, Torino, Italy.
Roberto GiardinoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Torino, Italy.
Bruno FerreroDepartment of Neurology, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Torino, Italy.
Francesco ArdissoneDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Torino, Italy.
Andrea VeltriDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Torino, Italy.
Ospedale San Luigi Gonzaga · ITCollegio Carlo Alberto · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate inter-reader reproducibility of five different region-of-interest (ROI) protocols for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in the anterior mediastinum.

methodsIn eighty-one subjects, on ADC mapping, two readers measured the ADC using five methods of ROI positioning that encompassed the entire tissue (whole tissue volume [WTV], three slices observer-defined [TSOD], single-slice [SS]) or the more restricted areas (one small round ROI [OSR]), multiple small round ROI [MSR]). Inter-observer variability was assessed with interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CoV), and Bland-Altman analysis. Nonparametric tests were performed to compare the ADC between ROI methods. The measurement time was recorded and compared between ROI methods.

resultsAll methods showed excellent inter-reader agreement with best and worst reproducibility in WTV and OSR, respectively (ICC, 0.937/0.874; CoV, 7.3 %/16.8 %; limits of agreement, ±0.44/±0.77 × 10

conclusionsAll methods demonstrate excellent inter-observer reproducibility with the best agreement in WTV, although it requires the longest measurement time. KEY POINTS: • All ROI protocols show excellent inter-observer reproducibility. • WTV measurements provide the most reproducible ADC values. • ROI size and positioning influence ADC measurements in the anterior mediastinum. • ADC values of OSR and MSR are significantly lower than other methods. • OSR and WTV methods require the shortest and longest measurement time, respectively.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMaleMediastinal NeoplasmsMediastinumMiddle AgedObserver VariationPatient PositioningReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesAnterior mediastinumApparent diffusion coefficientDiffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imagingInter-observer variabilityRegion of interest

Identifiers

PMID27516357
OpenAlexW2513707991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.