ArticleEuropean radiology2017
Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior mediastinum: inter-observer reproducibility of five different methods of region-of-interest positioning.
Article in European radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and validation of ADC-based nomogram model for predicting the prognostic factors in preoperative clinical early-stage cervical cancer patients.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Prediction of histologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma using dual-layer spectral-detector computed tomography (CT): comparison of two region of interest plotting methods.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Peripheral nerve sheath tumor: differentiation of malignant from benign tumors with conventional and diffusion-weighted MRI.European radiology · 2021Article
- Risk stratification of thymic epithelial tumors by using a nomogram combined with radiomic features and TNM staging.European radiology · 2021Article
- Article
- Importance of measurement repeatability of semi-quantitative imaging through PET-CT and PET-MR imaging in oncology.Translational cancer research · 2019Article
- Roles of the apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor volume in predicting tumor grade in patients with choroid plexus tumors.Neuroradiology · 2018Article
- Nonsuppressing normal thymus on chemical-shift MR imaging and anterior mediastinal lymphoma: differentiation with diffusion-weighted MR imaging by using the apparent diffusion coefficient.European radiology · 2018Article
- Incremental Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Further Characterizing Hypodense Mediastinal and Paracardiac Lesions Identified on Computed Tomography.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate inter-reader reproducibility of five different region-of-interest (ROI) protocols for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in the anterior mediastinum.
methodsIn eighty-one subjects, on ADC mapping, two readers measured the ADC using five methods of ROI positioning that encompassed the entire tissue (whole tissue volume [WTV], three slices observer-defined [TSOD], single-slice [SS]) or the more restricted areas (one small round ROI [OSR]), multiple small round ROI [MSR]). Inter-observer variability was assessed with interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CoV), and Bland-Altman analysis. Nonparametric tests were performed to compare the ADC between ROI methods. The measurement time was recorded and compared between ROI methods.
resultsAll methods showed excellent inter-reader agreement with best and worst reproducibility in WTV and OSR, respectively (ICC, 0.937/0.874; CoV, 7.3 %/16.8 %; limits of agreement, ±0.44/±0.77 × 10
conclusionsAll methods demonstrate excellent inter-observer reproducibility with the best agreement in WTV, although it requires the longest measurement time. KEY POINTS: • All ROI protocols show excellent inter-observer reproducibility. • WTV measurements provide the most reproducible ADC values. • ROI size and positioning influence ADC measurements in the anterior mediastinum. • ADC values of OSR and MSR are significantly lower than other methods. • OSR and WTV methods require the shortest and longest measurement time, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.