Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27516225›Full record

ArticleThorax2016

Multidimensional severity assessment in bronchiectasis: an analysis of seven European cohorts.

M J McDonnell, S Aliberti, P C Goeminne, K Dimakou, S C Zucchetti, J Davidson, C Ward, J G Laffey, S Finch, A Pesci and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Thorax, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03643302 (Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Tran-bronchoscopy Airway Clearance and Bronchoalveolar Lavage in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Bronchiectasis With Acute Exacerbation), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
21.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03643302 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Tran-bronchoscopy Airway Clearance and Bronchoalveolar Lavage in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Bronchiectasis With Acute Exacerbation

TypeobservationalSponsorShanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaRan2018 to 2019Enrolled189ConditionsBronchiectasis AdultArmsVersion BF-1T26 electronic bronchoscope
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bronchiectasis in Asia: a review of current status and challenges.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 7 countries.

M J McDonnellDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland.
S AlibertiDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
P C GoeminneDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
K DimakouFifth Department of Pulmonary Medicine, "Sotiria" Chest Diseases Hospital, Athens, Greece.
S C ZucchettiDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
J DavidsonInstitute of Cellular Medicine and Adult Bronchiectasis Service, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
C WardInstitute of Cellular Medicine and Adult Bronchiectasis Service, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
J G LaffeyLung Biology Group, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
S FinchScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
A PesciDepartment of Health Science, University of Milan Bicocca, Clinica Pneumologica, AO San Gerardo, Monza, Italy.
L J DupontDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
T C FardonScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
D SkrbicInstitute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina Sremska Kamenica, Put doktora Goldmana 4, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia.
D ObradovicInstitute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina Sremska Kamenica, Put doktora Goldmana 4, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia.
S CowmanHost Defence Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital and UK Imperial College, London, UK.
M R LoebingerHost Defence Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital and UK Imperial College, London, UK.
R M RutherfordDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland.
A De SoyzaInstitute of Cellular Medicine and Adult Bronchiectasis Service, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
J D ChalmersScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
Freeman Hospital · GBImperial College London · GBInstitute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina · RSNewcastle University · GBNinewells Hospital · GBFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITSotiria General Hospital · GRUniversity Hospital Galway · IEUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversity of Toronto · CAVlaamse Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecolo · BE

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L011263/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBronchiectasis is a multidimensional disease associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Two disease-specific clinical prediction tools have been developed, the Bronchiectasis Severity Index (BSI) and the FACED score, both of which stratify patients into severity risk categories to predict the probability of mortality.

methodsWe aimed to compare the predictive utility of BSI and FACED in assessing clinically relevant disease outcomes across seven European cohorts independent of their original validation studies.

resultsThe combined cohorts totalled 1612. Pooled analysis showed that both scores had a good discriminatory predictive value for mortality (pooled area under the curve (AUC) 0.76, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.78 for both scores) with the BSI demonstrating a higher sensitivity (65% vs 28%) but lower specificity (70% vs 93%) compared with the FACED score. Calibration analysis suggested that the BSI performed consistently well across all cohorts, while FACED consistently overestimated mortality in 'severe' patients (pooled OR 0.33 (0.23 to 0.48), p<0.0001). The BSI accurately predicted hospitalisations (pooled AUC 0.82, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.84), exacerbations, quality of life (QoL) and respiratory symptoms across all risk categories. FACED had poor discrimination for hospital admissions (pooled AUC 0.65, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.67) with low sensitivity at 16% and did not consistently predict future risk of exacerbations, QoL or respiratory symptoms. No association was observed with FACED and 6 min walk distance (6MWD) or lung function decline.

conclusionThe BSI accurately predicts mortality, hospital admissions, exacerbations, QoL, respiratory symptoms, 6MWD and lung function decline in bronchiectasis, providing a clinically relevant evaluation of disease severity.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAgedBronchiectasisDisease ProgressionEuropeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesForced Expiratory VolumeHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisQuality of LifeRisk AssessmentBronchiectasisRespiratory Infection

Identifiers

PMID27516225
PMCPMC5136700
OpenAlexW2501050628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.