Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27516089›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Contrasting origin of B chromosomes in two cervids (Siberian roe deer and grey brocket deer) unravelled by chromosome-specific DNA sequencing.

Alexey I Makunin, Ilya G Kichigin, Denis M Larkin, Patricia C M O'Brien, Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith, Fengtang Yang, Anastasiya A Proskuryakova, Nadezhda V Vorobieva, Ekaterina N Chernyaeva, Stephen J O'Brien and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
21.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Whole-chromosome fusions in the karyotype evolution ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genomic Tackling of Human Satellite DNA: Breaking Barriers through Time.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. B Chromosomes in GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexey I MakuninInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Novosibirsk, Russia. alex.makunin@gmail.com.
Ilya G KichiginInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Denis M LarkinRoyal Veterinary College, University of London, London, UK.
Patricia C M O'BrienCambridge Resource Centre for Comparative Genomics, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Malcolm A Ferguson-SmithCambridge Resource Centre for Comparative Genomics, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Fengtang YangWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Anastasiya A ProskuryakovaInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Nadezhda V VorobievaInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Ekaterina N ChernyaevaTheodosius Dobzhansky Center for Genome Bioinformatics, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Stephen J O'BrienTheodosius Dobzhansky Center for Genome Bioinformatics, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Alexander S GraphodatskyInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Vladimir A TrifonovInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology · RUNovosibirsk State University · RUSt Petersburg University · RUGenomics (United Kingdom) · GBRoyal Veterinary College · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundB chromosomes are dispensable and variable karyotypic elements found in some species of animals, plants and fungi. They often originate from duplications and translocations of host genomic regions or result from hybridization. In most species, little is known about their DNA content. Here we perform high-throughput sequencing and analysis of B chromosomes of roe deer and brocket deer, the only representatives of Cetartiodactyla known to have B chromosomes.

resultsIn this study we developed an approach to identify genomic regions present on chromosomes by high-throughput sequencing of DNA generated from flow-sorted chromosomes using degenerate-oligonucleotide-primed PCR. Application of this method on small cattle autosomes revealed a previously described KIT gene region translocation associated with colour sidedness. Implementing this approach to B chromosomes from two cervid species, Siberian roe deer (Capreolus pygargus) and grey brocket deer (Mazama gouazoubira), revealed dramatically different genetic content: roe deer B chromosomes consisted of two duplicated genomic regions (a total of 1.42-1.98 Mbp) involving three genes, while grey brocket deer B chromosomes contained 26 duplicated regions (a total of 8.28-9.31 Mbp) with 34 complete and 21 partial genes, including KIT and RET protooncogenes, previously found on supernumerary chromosomes in canids. Sequence variation analysis of roe deer B chromosomes revealed a high frequency of mutations and increased heterozygosity due to either amplification within B chromosomes or divergence between different Bs. In contrast, grey brocket deer B chromosomes were found to be more homogeneous and resembled autosomes in patterns of sequence variation. Similar tendencies were observed in repetitive DNA composition.

conclusionsOur data demonstrate independent origins of B chromosomes in the grey brocket and roe deer. We hypothesize that the B chromosomes of these two cervid species represent different stages of B chromosome sequences evolution: probably nascent and similar to autosomal copies in brocket deer, highly derived in roe deer. Based on the presence of the same orthologous protooncogenes in canids and brocket deer Bs we argue that genomic regions involved in B chromosome formation are not random. In addition, our approach is also applicable to the characterization of other evolutionary and clinical rearrangements.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGene DuplicationAnimalsChromosome MappingChromosomes, Human, 4-5Chromosomes, MammalianDeerDNA PrimersGene ExpressionHeterozygoteHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansKaryotypingMutation RatePolymerase Chain ReactionProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitDNA PrimersProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retB chromosome EvolutionDOP-PCRGrey Brocket DeerHigh-throughput SequencingProtooncogenesSiberian Roe Deer

Identifiers

PMID27516089
PMCPMC4982142
OpenAlexW2514636650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.