ArticleBMC systems biology2016
Robust sparse canonical correlation analysis.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-region brain transcriptomes uncover two subtypes of aging individuals with differences in Alzheimer risk and the impact ofiScience · 2026Article
- Sparse CCA-based mediation analysis with high-dimensional exposures and mediators.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Sparse Multivariate Analysis Reveals Dissociable White Matter Networks for Cognitive and Motor Processing Speed.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Sparse Gaussianized Canonical Correlation Analysis with Applications to Portfolio Analysis.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Canonical Correlation Analysis.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2023Article
- sJIVE: Supervised Joint and Individual Variation Explained.Computational statistics & data analysis · 2022Article
- Searching for a technology-driven acute rheumatic fever test: the START study protocol.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Article
- Model-based joint visualization of multiple compositional omics datasets.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Reference Trait Analysis Reveals Correlations Between Gene Expression and Quantitative Traits in Disjoint Samples.Genetics · 2019Article
- Cluster analysis of replicated alternative polyadenylation data using canonical correlation analysis.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- The changes of immunoglobulin G N-glycosylation in blood lipids and dyslipidaemia.Journal of translational medicine · 2018Observational
- Best practices for analysing microbiomes.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2018Review
- A data-driven investigation of relationships between bipolar psychotic symptoms and schizophrenia genome-wide significant genetic loci.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2018Article
- The statistical theory of linear selection indices from phenotypic to genomic selection.Crop scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCanonical correlation analysis (CCA) is a multivariate statistical method which describes the associations between two sets of variables. The objective is to find linear combinations of the variables in each data set having maximal correlation. In genomics, CCA has become increasingly important to estimate the associations between gene expression data and DNA copy number change data. The identification of such associations might help to increase our understanding of the development of diseases such as cancer. However, these data sets are typically high-dimensional, containing a lot of variables relative to the number of objects. Moreover, the data sets might contain atypical observations since it is likely that objects react differently to treatments. We discuss a method for Robust Sparse CCA, thereby providing a solution to both issues. Sparse estimation produces canonical vectors with some of their elements estimated as exactly zero. As such, their interpretability is improved. Robust methods can cope with atypical observations in the data.
resultsWe illustrate the good performance of the Robust Sparse CCA method by several simulation studies and three biometric examples. Robust Sparse CCA considerably outperforms its main alternatives in (1) correctly detecting the main associations between the data sets, in (2) accurately estimating these associations, and in (3) detecting outliers.
conclusionsRobust Sparse CCA delivers interpretable canonical vectors, while at the same time coping with outlying observations. The proposed method is able to describe the associations between high-dimensional data sets, which are nowadays commonplace in genomics. Furthermore, the Robust Sparse CCA method allows to characterize outliers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.