Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27515962›Full record

Trial reportCarcinogenesis2016

Genetic variants of the Wnt signaling pathway as predictors of aggressive disease and reclassification in men with early stage prostate cancer on active surveillance.

Xiang Shu, Yuanqing Ye, Jian Gu, Yonggang He, John W Davis, Timothy C Thompson, Christopher J Logothetis, Jeri Kim, Xifeng Wu

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Carcinogenesis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Review of Prostate Cancer Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS).Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiang ShuDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Yuanqing YeDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Jian GuDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Yonggang HeDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
John W DavisDepartment of Urology and.
Timothy C ThompsonDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Christopher J LogothetisDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Jeri KimDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Xifeng WuDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USRuijin Hospital · CN

Funding

Targeting Tumor Microenvironment-Induced Therapy Resistance in Prostate Cancer Bone MetastasisP50CA140388 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LOGOTHETIS, CHRISTOPHER J., THOMPSON, TIMOTHY CHARLES · 2009 to 2022
$23.4M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA140388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the genetic predictors of prostate cancer aggressiveness and reclassification in men with localized prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance. The Wnt signaling pathway is important for prostate cancer development and progression. Identifying genetic variants associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness and reclassification may have a potential role in the management of localized patients. In this study, we used a three-phase design. In phases I and II prostate cancer patient cohort, 578 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 45 genes of the Wnt signaling pathway were analyzed in 1762 localized prostate cancer patients. Twelve SNPs from four regions were significantly associated with aggressive disease, among which, three linked SNPs in CSNK1A1 at 5q32 (represented by rs752822) may differentiate GS 4+3 from GS 3+4 patients (OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.12-1.87, P = 4.76×10(-3)). In phase III active surveillance (AS) cohort, genotyping of rs752822 (candidate from phases I and II) and previously identified rs2735839 were determined in 494 GS ≤7 patients. We found a significant association between rs2735839 and prostate cancer reclassification in the AS cohort (AG + AA versus GG, HR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.11-2.28, P = 0.012) and a suggestive association of rs752822. Jointly, rs752822 and rs2735839 showed good potentials in risk-stratifying GS 7 patients and predicting disease reclassification (OR = 2.71, 95% CI = 1.62-4.51, P = 1×10(-4) in phase II; HR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.13-3.18, P = 0.016 in phase III). In summary, rs752822 and rs2735839 may assist in risk-stratifying GS 7 patients and predict prostate cancer reclassification. The significant associations were independent from GS, T stage and PSA levels at baseline.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAgedCasein Kinase IIGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasm StagingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsWnt Signaling PathwayCasein Kinase IICSNK2A1 protein, humanNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27515962
PMCPMC5035398
OpenAlexW2510856567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.