[Not Available].

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a retrospective analysis at a tertiary university center.Surgery open science · 2023
   Article
2. Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Leakage after Esophageal Surgery: Ten Year Analysis in a Tertiary University Center.Clinical endoscopy · 2022
   Article
3. Feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of endoscopic vacuum therapy for intrathoracic anastomotic leakage following transthoracic esophageal resection.BMC gastroenterology · 2021
   Article
4. Endoscopic negative pressure therapy of the upper gastrointestinal tract.Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2019
   Review
5. [Endoscopic negative pressure therapy of the upper gastrointestinal tract. German version].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  [Surgical treatment of acute mediastinitis].2016

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.