Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27515807›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2017

Mesh shrinkage depends on mesh properties and anchoring device: an experimental long-term study in sheep.

S Harsløf, N Zinther, T Harsløf, C Danielsen, P Wara, H Friis-Andersen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. An easier Lichtenstein hernioplasty.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S HarsløfDepartment of Surgery, Regional Hospital Horsens, Sundvej 30, 8700, Horsens, Denmark. sanneharslof@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6809-0909
N ZintherDepartment of Surgery, Regional Hospital Horsens, Sundvej 30, 8700, Horsens, Denmark.
T HarsløfDepartment of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
C DanielsenInstitute of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
P WaraDepartment of Surgery P, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
H Friis-AndersenDepartment of Surgery, Regional Hospital Horsens, Sundvej 30, 8700, Horsens, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe choice of mesh and anchoring device in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is controversial. Clinically important long-term properties of mesh and anchoring device such as mesh shrinkage have been sparsely investigated. Furthermore, the effect of various anchoring devices on mesh properties has never been examined.

methodsIn 20 sheep, using laparoscopy, we inserted three PhysiomeshTM (large pore, lightweight) and three VentralightTMST (small pore, mediumweight), anchored with ProTackTM, SecurestrapTM or GlubranTM, respectively. After 6 and 12 months, 10 sheep at each time-point, we euthanized the animals, harvested the meshes with fascia, and measured the exact size and area of the mesh, expressing mesh shrinkage as a percentage of the initial area.

resultsThe shrinkage of PhysiomeshTM was 35.7 %, 23.8 % and 17.7 % when anchored with ProtackTM, GlubranTM or SecurestrapTM, respectively. Shrinkage with ProtackTM was significantly higher than with either GlubranTM or SecurestrapTM, respectively (p<0.01 and p<0.01). The shrinkage of VentralightTMST was 19.3 %, 22.2 % and 19.6 % when anchored with ProtackTM, GlubranTM and SecurestrapTM, respectively (p>0.05 for all pairwise comparisons). Overall shrinkage of PhysiomeshTM anchored with ProtackTM was significantly higher for all comparisons (p<0.01).

conclusionOur results suggest that mesh shrinkage in sheep takes place within 6 months after implantation. A significant interaction between mesh and type of anchoring indicates that shrinkage may depend on both mesh properties and anchoring device. The results of the current study imply that the combined effect of mesh and anchoring device should be evaluated in future studies.

Indexed as

Surgical MeshAbdominal WallAnimalsFasciaFemaleHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyLaparoscopyPolypropylenesProstheses and ImplantsSheepSuture AnchorsSuture TechniquesPolypropylenesLaparoscopyMesh anchoringMesh shrinkageVentral hernia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.