Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27515673›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

Can a lifestyle intervention be offered through NHS breast cancer screening? Challenges and opportunities identified in a qualitative study of women attending screening.

Ellie Conway, Sally Wyke, Jacqui Sugden, Nanette Mutrie, Annie S Anderson, ActWELL team

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ellie ConwayInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Science, University of Glasgow, 27 Bute Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RS, UK.
Sally WykeInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Science, University of Glasgow, 27 Bute Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RS, UK.
Jacqui SugdenCentre for Public Health Nutrition Research, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, University of Dundee, Level 7, Dundee, DD2 4BF, UK.
Nanette MutriePhysical Activity for Health Research Centre, The University of Edinburgh, St Leonard's Land, Holyrood Road, Edinburgh, EH8 8AQ, UK.
Annie S AndersonCentre for Public Health Nutrition Research, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, University of Dundee, Level 7, Dundee, DD2 4BF, UK. a.s.anderson@dundee.ac.uk.
ActWELL team
University of Dundee · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZH/4/745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAround one third of breast cancers in post-menopausal women could be prevented by decreasing body fatness and alcohol intake and increasing physical activity. This study aimed to explore views and attitudes on lifestyle intervention approaches in order to inform the proposed content of a lifestyle intervention programme amongst women attending breast cancer screening.

methodsWomen attending breast cancer screening clinics in Dundee and Glasgow, were invited to participate in focus group discussions (FGD) by clinic staff. The groups were convened out with the clinic setting and moderated by an experienced researcher who attained brief details on socio-demographic background and audio-recorded the discussions. Data analysis was guided by the framework approach. The main topics of enquiry were: Understanding of risk of breast cancer and its prevention, views on engaging with a lifestyle intervention programme offered through breast cancer screening and programme design and content.

resultsThirty one women attended 5 focus groups. Participant ages ranged from 51 to 78 years and 38 % lived in the two most deprived quintiles of residential areas. Women were generally positive about being offered a programme at breast cancer screening but sceptical about lifestyle associated risk, citing genetics, bad luck and knowing women with breast cancer who led healthy lifestyles as reasons to query the importance of lifestyle. Engagement via clinic staff and delivery of the programme by lifestyle coaches out with the screening setting was viewed favourably. The importance of body weight, physical activity and alcohol consumption with disease was widely known although most were surprised at the association with breast cancer. They were particularly surprised about the role of alcohol and resistant to thinking about themselves having a problem. They expressed frustration that lifestyle guidance was often conflicting and divergent over time. The concept of focussing on small lifestyle changes, which were personalised, supported socially and appropriate to age and ability were welcomed.

conclusionsOffering access to a lifestyle programme through breast screening appears acceptable. Explaining the relevance of the target behaviours for breast cancer health, endorsing and utilising consistent messages and identifying personalised, mutually agreed, behaviour change goals provides a framework for programme development.

Indexed as

Risk Reduction BehaviorAdultAgedBehavior TherapyBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerExerciseFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsGovernment ProgramsHumansMiddle AgedPreventive Health ServicesQualitative ResearchRisk FactorsAlcoholBody-weightBreast cancer screeningLifestylePhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID27515673
PMCPMC4982403
OpenAlexW2508882631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.