Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27515447›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2016

Nephroprotective effects of enalapril after [177Lu]-DOTATATE therapy using serial renal scintigraphies in a murine model of radiation-induced nephropathy.

Harun Ilhan, Hao Wang, Franz J Gildehaus, Carmen Wängler, Tanja Herrler, Andrei Todica, Julia Schlichtiger, Paul Cumming, Peter Bartenstein, Marcus Hacker and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Radiomitigators: Breakthroughs in Post-Radiation Recovery.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Salvage PRRT withBMC cancer · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Harun IlhanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hao WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Franz J GildehausDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Carmen WänglerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Tanja HerrlerDepartment of Surgery, Campus Großhadern, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andrei TodicaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Julia SchlichtigerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Paul CummingDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Peter BartensteinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marcus HackerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander R HaugDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. alexander.haug@meduniwien.ac.at.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Vienna · ATHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiation-induced nephropathy is still dose limiting in radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors. We investigated the nephroprotective potential of the angiotensine converting enzyme inhibiting drug enalpril after [177Lu]-DOTATATE therapy in a murine model of radiation-induced nephropathy by renal scintigraphy. At first, the appropriate therapy activity to induce nephropathy was identified. Baseline scintigraphy (n = 12) entailed 12-min dynamic acquisitions after injection of 25 MBq [99mTc]-MAG3, which was followed by radionuclide therapy at four escalating activities of [177Lu]-DOTATATE: group (Gp) 1: 10 MBq; Gp 2: 20 MBq; Gp 3: 40 MBq; Gp 4: 65 MBq. Follow-up [99mTc]-MAG3 scintigraphy was carried out at days 9, 23, 44, and 65. The treatment activity for the intervention arm was selected on the basis of histological examination and declining renal function. In the second part, daily administration by gavage of 10 mg/kg/d enalapril or water (control group) was initiated on the day of radionuclide therapy. Follow-up scintigraphy was carried out at days 9, 23, 44, 65, and 86. We also created a non-therapy control group to detect therapy-independent changes of renal function over time. For all scintigraphies, mean renogram curves were analyzed and the "fractional uptake rate" (FUR; %I.D./min ± SEM) of the tracer by the kidneys was calculated as an index of renal clearance.

resultsAt day 65 of follow-up, no significant change in the FUR relative to baseline (11.0 ± 0.3) was evident in radionuclide therapy groups 1 (11.2 ± 0.5) and 2 (10.1 ± 0.6), but FUR was significantly reduced in groups 3 (8.93 ± 0.6, p < 0.05) and 4 (6.0 ± 0.8, p < 0.01); we chose 40 MBq [177Lu]-DOTATATE (Gp 3) for the intervention study. Here, at the last day of follow-up (day 86), FUR was unaltered in enalapril-treated mice (11.8 ± 0.5) relative to the baseline group (12.4 ± 0.3) and non-therapy group (11.9 ± 0.8), whereas FUR in the control group had undergone a significant decline (9.3 ± 0.5; p < 0.01). Histological examination revealed prevention of kidney damage by enalapril treatment.

conclusionsTreatment with enalapril is effective for nephroprotection during radionuclide therapy with [177Lu]-DOTATATE in mice. Although these results are only limitedly transferable to human studies, enalapril might serve as a promising drug in the mitigation of nephropathy following treatment with [177Lu]-DOTATATE.

Indexed as

[177Lu]-DOTATATEEnalaprilNeuroendocrine tumorsRadiation-induced nephropathyTc-99m-MAG3 scintigraphy

Identifiers

PMID27515447
PMCPMC4980865
OpenAlexW2508810130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.