Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27514571›Full record

ReviewAutonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical2017

Eppur Si Muove: The dynamic nature of physiological control of renal blood flow by the renal sympathetic nerves.

Alicia M Schiller, Peter Ricci Pellegrino, Irving H Zucker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The denervation or activation of renal sympathetic nerve and renal blood flow.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alicia M SchillerDepartment of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States; US Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX, United States.
Peter Ricci PellegrinoDepartment of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Irving H ZuckerDepartment of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States. Electronic address: izucker@unmc.edu.
Nebraska Medical Center · USUnited States Army Institute of Surgical Research · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

The Role of Excitatory Input into the PVN on Increased Sympathetic Drive in HeartP01HL062222 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI CORNISH, KURTIS G · 1999 to 2019
$32.2M
Central Rho-Kinase Inhibition and Ang II-induced Sympatho-excitationF30HL118974 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI PELLEGRINO, PETER RICCI · 2014 to 2016
$118k
NHLBI NIH HHS F30 HL118974NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL062222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tubuloglomerular feedback and the myogenic response are widely appreciated as important regulators of renal blood flow, but the role of the sympathetic nervous system in physiological renal blood flow control remains controversial. Where classic studies using static measures of renal blood flow failed, dynamic approaches have succeeded in demonstrating sympathetic control of renal blood flow under normal physiological conditions. This review focuses on transfer function analysis of renal pressure-flow, which leverages the physical relationship between blood pressure and flow to assess the underlying vascular control mechanisms. Studies using this approach indicate that the renal nerves are important in the rapid regulation of the renal vasculature. Animals with intact renal innervation show a sympathetic signature in the frequency range associated with sympathetic vasomotion that is eliminated by renal denervation. In conscious rabbits, this sympathetic signature exerts vasoconstrictive, baroreflex control of renal vascular conductance, matching well with the rhythmic, baroreflex-influenced control of renal sympathetic nerve activity and complementing findings from other studies employing dynamic approaches to study renal sympathetic vascular control. In this light, classic studies reporting that nerve stimulation and renal denervation do not affect static measures of renal blood flow provide evidence for the strength of renal autoregulation rather than evidence against physiological renal sympathetic control of renal blood flow. Thus, alongside tubuloglomerular feedback and the myogenic response, renal sympathetic outflow should be considered an important physiological regulator of renal blood flow. Clinically, renal sympathetic vasomotion may be important for solving the problems facing the field of therapeutic renal denervation.

Indexed as

AnimalsKidneyRenal CirculationSympathetic Nervous SystemBaroreflexHomeostasisKidney/blood supplyRenal arteryRenal circulationSympathetic nervous systemVasoconstriction

Identifiers

PMID27514571
PMCPMC5290256
OpenAlexW2483686479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.