Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27514372›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical genomics2016

Unsolved challenges of clinical whole-exome sequencing: a systematic literature review of end-users' views.

Gabrielle Bertier, Martin Hétu, Yann Joly

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A systematic literature review of disclosure practices and reported outcomes for medically actionable genomic secondary findings.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A Systematic Literature Review of Whole Exome and Genome Sequencing Population Studies of Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Genetic Testing of Movements Disorders: A Review of Clinical Utility.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabrielle BertierCenter of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, 740 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0G1, Canada. gabrielle.bertier@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-3319-3721
Martin HétuCenter of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, 740 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0G1, Canada.
Yann JolyCenter of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, 740 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0G1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhole-exome sequencing (WES) consists in the capture, sequencing and analysis of all exons in the human genome. Originally developed in the research context, this technology is now increasingly used clinically to inform patient care. The implementation of WES into healthcare poses significant organizational, regulatory, and ethical hurdles, which are widely discussed in the literature.

methodsIn order to inform future policy decisions on the integration of WES into standard clinical practice, we performed a systematic literature review to identify the most important challenges directly reported by technology users.

resultsOut of 2094 articles, we selected and analyzed 147 which reported a total of 23 different challenges linked to the production, analysis, reporting and sharing of patients' WES data. Interpretation of variants of unknown significance, incidental findings, and the cost and reimbursement of WES-based tests were the most reported challenges across all articles.

conclusionsWES is already used in the clinical setting, and may soon be considered the standard of care for specific medical conditions. Yet, technology users are calling for certain standards and guidelines to be published before this technology replaces more focused approaches such as gene panels sequencing. In addition, a number of infrastructural adjustments will have to be made for clinics to store, process and analyze the amounts of data produced by WES.

Indexed as

ExomeGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID27514372
PMCPMC4982236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.