Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27514371›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of urology2017

Combination treatment with mirabegron and solifenacin in patients with overactive bladder: exploratory responder analyses of efficacy and evaluation of patient-reported outcomes from a randomized, double-blind, factorial, dose-ranging, Phase II study (SYMPHONY).

P Abrams, C Kelleher, D Staskin, R Kay, A Martan, I Mincik, D Newgreen, A Ridder, A Paireddy, R van Maanen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01340027 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Factorial, Parallel-Group, Active and Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Six Dose Combinations of Solifenacin Succinate and Mirabegron Compared to Mirabegron and Solifenacin Succinate Monotherapies in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder.), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01340027 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Factorial, Parallel-Group, Active and Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Six Dose Combinations of Solifenacin Succinate and Mirabegron Compared to Mirabegron and Solifenacin Succinate Monotherapies in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstellas Pharma Europe B.V.Ran2011 to 2012Enrolled1,307ConditionsUrologic Diseases, Urinary Bladder Diseases, Urological Manifestations, Signs and SymptomsArmsMirabegron, Solifenacin succinate, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Mirabegron in the Management of Overactive Bladder Syndrome.International journal of women's health · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. βBritish journal of pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. CUA guideline on adult overactive bladder.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2017
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

P AbramsBristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, BS10 5NB, Bristol, UK. paul.abrams@bui.ac.uk.
C KelleherGuy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK.
D StaskinTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
R KayRK Statistics Ltd, Bakewell, UK.
A MartanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
I MincikFaculty of Healthcare of the University of Prešov, Prešov, Slovakia.
D NewgreenAstellas Pharma BV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
A RidderAstellas Pharma BV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
A PaireddyAstellas Pharma BV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
R van MaanenAstellas Pharma BV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Astellas Pharma (Netherlands) · NLCharles University · CZSouthmead Hospital · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBTufts University · USUniversity of Prešov · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis large dose-ranging study explored the benefits of different combinations of mirabegron and solifenacin on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and patients ('responders') achieving clinically meaningful improvements in efficacy and HRQoL.

methodsSYMPHONY (NCT01340027) was a Phase II, placebo- and monotherapy-controlled, dose-ranging, 12-week trial. Adult patients with overactive bladder (OAB) for ≥3 months were randomized to 1 of 12 groups: 6 combination (solifenacin 2.5/5/10 mg + mirabegron 25/50 mg), 5 monotherapy (solifenacin 2.5/5/10 mg, or mirabegron 25/50 mg), or placebo. Change from baseline to end of treatment was assessed, versus placebo and solifenacin 5 mg in: PROs (OAB-q [Symptom Bother/total HRQoL] and Patient Perception of Bladder Condition score), and responders achieving minimally important differences (MIDs) in PROs and predetermined clinically meaningful improvements in efficacy (e.g. <8 micturitions/24 h). Changes in PROs and responders were analysed using an ANCOVA model and logistic regression, respectively.

resultsThe Full Analysis Set included 1278 patients. Combination therapy of solifenacin 5/10 mg + mirabegron 25/50 mg significantly improved PROs versus solifenacin 5 mg and placebo, and significantly more responders achieved MIDs in PROs and efficacy. Micturition frequency normalization was approximately twofold greater with 10 + 25 mg (OR 2.06 [95 % CI 1.11, 3.84; p = 0.023]) and 5 + 50 mg (OR 1.91 [95 % CI 1.14, 3.21; p = 0.015]) versus solifenacin 5 mg.

conclusionCombining mirabegron 25/50 mg and solifenacin 5/10 mg improves objective and subjective efficacy outcomes compared with placebo or solifenacin 5 mg.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAcetanilidesAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinimal Clinically Important DifferencePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSolifenacin SuccinateThiazolesTreatment OutcomeAcetanilidesmirabegronSolifenacin SuccinateThiazolesUrological AgentsCombination therapyMirabegronPatient-reported outcomesResponder analysesSolifenacinSYMPHONY

Identifiers

PMID27514371
OpenAlexW2510148915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.