Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27514368›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2016

New insights into discrepancies between self-reported and accelerometer-measured moderate to vigorous physical activity among women - the mPED trial.

Yoshimi Fukuoka, William Haskell, Eric Vittinghoff

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01280812 (Applying Mobile Persuasive Technologies to Increase Physical Activity in Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01280812 nacompletednot on this map

Applying Mobile Persuasive Technologies to Increase Physical Activity in Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2011 to 2015Enrolled210ConditionsSedentary Lifestyle, Physical ActivityArmsMobile phone based physical activity intervention with maintenance plus, Mobile phone based physical activity intervention with maintenance regular, Control (pedometer only)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Modeling longitudinal variation in affective response to exercise across a 16-week randomized control trial (RCT).Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yoshimi FukuokaInstitute for Health & Aging / Department of Physiological Nursing, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California Street, Suite 340, San Francisco, 94118, USA. Yoshimi.Fukuoka@ucsf.edu.
William HaskellStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, 1070 Arastradero Rd. Suite 100, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Eric VittinghoffDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.

Funding

Applying Mobile-Persuasive Technologies to Increase Physical Activity in WomenR01HL104147 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FUKUOKA, YOSHIMI · 2010 to 2014
$3.7M
Mentoring and research in applying digital technologies to prevent chronic IllnessesK24NR015812 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FUKUOKA, YOSHIMI · 2015 to 2020
$930k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL104147NINR NIH HHS K24 NR015812
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aims of this report were 1) to describe the duration of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and the proportion of participants meeting the recommended criterion of at least 150 min of MVPA per week as measured by the 7 Day Physical Activity Recall Questionnaire (7D-PAR) and accelerometer among women who were enrolled in the mPED trial; 2) to assess the level of agreement of the two measures using a Bland-Altman plot; and 3) to describe the positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) of meeting the guidelines by calculating the percentage of women meeting the physical activity recommendation by the 7D-PAR who also met this recommendation based on data from the accelerometer.

methodsBaseline data on duration of MVPA from the mPED trial were analyzed for 215 women. Among the women who met the recommended criterion by the 7D-PAR (self-report), we calculated the proportion of individuals who also met it by the accelerometer (objective measure). A Bland Altman Plot was used to assess concordance between the two measures.

resultsThe mean age was 52.4 (±11.2) years; 54.4 % were white; and 48.8 % were single or divorced. While median MVPA was 160 min/week by the 7D-PAR, it was only 24 min/week in the accelerometer. A total of 117 women met the 150-min criterion by the 7D-PAR. Of these, only 18 also met the criterion by the objective measure (PPV 15.4 %, 95 % CI 9.4-23.2 %). Among the 98 women who did not meet the criterion by the 7D-PAR, none met it by the accelerometer (NPV 100 %). A Bland Altman plot showed the mean difference of +145 min between the two measures with a 95 % limit of agreement at + 471 to -181 min.

conclusionsThe large discrepancy between the self-reported and objective measures of MVPA meeting the 150-min criterion suggests that self-reported physical activity measures should be used with caution in intervention studies. While our data suggest that self-report could be used to identify a physically inactive sample, it would be likely to over-estimate the proportions of women who become active in one or both arms of trials of interventions promoting MVPA.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01280812.

Indexed as

ExerciseSelf ReportAccelerometryAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsAccelerometerModerate to vigorous physical activityPhysical activityRandomized controlled trialSelf-reported questionnaireWomen

Identifiers

PMID27514368
PMCPMC4982411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.