ArticleNMR in biomedicine2016
Validating a robust double-quantum-filtered (1) H MRS lactate measurement method in high-grade brain tumours.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Tumor pH in Breast Cancer Imaging: Biology, Diagnostic Applications, and Emerging Techniques.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Assessment of Hypoxia in Breast Cancer: Emerging Functional MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques and Clinical Applications.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Repeatability of Lac+ measurements in healthy human brain at 3 T.NMR in biomedicine · 2024Article
- Review
- In-phase simultaneous spectral editing of lactate and alanine with suppression of J-coupled lipids by the modified selective multiple quantum coherence sequences.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2022Article
- Coherence pathway analysis of J-coupled lipids and lactate and effective suppression of lipids upon the selective multiple quantum coherence lactate editing sequence.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2022Article
- Spectral editing inNMR in biomedicine · 2021Article
- In vitro singlet state and zero-quantum encoded magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Illustration with N-acetyl-aspartate.PloS one · 2020Article
- Simultaneous editing of GABA and GSH with Hadamard-encoded MR spectroscopic imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2019Article
- Targeting tumor-associated acidity in cancer immunotherapy.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2018Review
- Validating a robust double-quantum-filtered (1) H MRS lactate measurement method in high-grade brain tumours.NMR in biomedicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
(1) H MRS measurements of lactate are often confounded by overlapping lipid signals. Double-quantum (DQ) filtering eliminates lipid signals and permits single-shot measurements, which avoid subtraction artefacts in moving tissues. This study evaluated a single-voxel-localized DQ filtering method qualitatively and quantitatively for measuring lactate concentrations in the presence of lipid, using high-grade brain tumours in which the results could be compared with standard acquisition as a reference. Paired standard acquisition and DQ-filtered (1) H MR spectra were acquired at 3T from patients receiving treatment for glioblastoma, using fLASER (localization by adiabatic selective refocusing using frequency offset corrected inversion pulses) single-voxel localization. Data were acquired from 2 × 2 × 2 cm(3) voxels, with a repetition time of 1 s and 128 averages (standard acquisition) or 256 averages (DQ-filtered acquisition), requiring 2.15 and 4.3 min respectively. Of 37 evaluated data pairs, 20 cases (54%) had measureable lactate (fitted Cramér-Rao lower bounds ≤ 20%) in either the DQ-filtered or the standard acquisition spectra. The measured DQ-filtered lactate signal was consistently downfield of lipid (1.33 ± 0.03 ppm vs 1.22 ± 0.08 ppm; p = 0.002), showing that it was not caused by lipid breakthrough, and that it matched the lactate signal seen in standard measurements (1.36 ± 0.02 ppm). In the absence of lipid, similar lactate concentrations were measured by the two methods (mean ratio DQ filtered/standard acquisition = 1.10 ± 0.21). In 7/20 cases with measurable lactate, signal was not measureable in the standard acquisition owing to lipid overlap but was quantified in the DQ-filtered acquisition. Conversely, lactate was undetected in seven DQ-filtered acquisitions but visible using the standard acquisition. In conclusion, the DQ filtering method has proven robust in eliminating lipid and permits uncontaminated measurement of lactate. This is important validation prior to use in tissues outside the brain, which contain large amounts of lipid and which are often susceptible to motion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.