Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27513995›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2016

Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening Among Mexican Migrant Women, 2013.

Natalie Guerrero, Xiao Zhang, Gudelia Rangel, J Eduardo Gonzalez-Fagoaga, Ana Martinez-Donate

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalie GuerreroSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Xiao ZhangSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Gudelia RangelMexico Section, U.S.-Mexico Border Health Commission, Tijuana, Mexico.
J Eduardo Gonzalez-FagoagaMexico Section, U.S.-Mexico Border Health Commission, Tijuana, Mexico.
Ana Martinez-DonateDornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, 3215 Market St, Nesbitt Hall 458, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Email: martinez-donate@drexel.edu.
CT Group Of Institutions · INUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

INTEGRATED TRAINING FOR PHYSICIAN-SCIENTISTST32GM008692 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURKARD, MARK E · 1998 to 2020
$10.3M
HIV Risk and Access to Health Care Among Mobile PopulationsR01HD046886 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MARTINEZ-DONATE, ANA P · 2007 to 2023
$6.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD046886NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInformation on cervical and breast cancer screening among Latinas in the United States is limited. Even less information is available on screening practices of migrant women who engage in circular migration. We examined rates of cervical and breast cancer screening and the extent to which sociodemographics and other characteristics explain screening practices of Mexican migrant women who return to Mexico from the United States.

methodsWe used data from a cross-sectional probability survey of Mexico-born migrant women who returned, through Tijuana, to Mexico from the United States in 2013. The sample consisted of women who returned involuntarily (via deportation) or voluntarily; 177 reported authorized documentation status, and 36 reported unauthorized documentation status in the previous 12 months. Descriptive statistics were calculated and logistic regressions were estimated.

resultsOf 36 undocumented migrant women, 8 (22.2%) had a Papanicolaou test and 11 (30.6%) had a mammogram in the previous year; of 177 documented migrants, 83 (46.9%) had a Papanicolaou test and 68 (38.4%) had a mammogram. Undocumented migrants were less likely than documented migrants to receive a Papanicolaou test (odds ratio [OR] = 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.67); the likelihood was similar after adjustment for sociodemographic, migration, and acculturation factors (adjusted OR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.12-0.90). Having health insurance (adjusted OR = 4.17; 95% CI, 1.80-9.65) and a regular source of health care (adjusted OR = 2.83; 95% CI, 1.05-7.65) were significant predictors of receiving a mammogram but not a Papanicolaou test.

conclusionPublic health programs are needed to improve access to cervical and breast cancer screenings for Latina migrant women in general and undocumented circular migrants in particular.

Indexed as

AdultBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansInsurance, HealthLogistic ModelsMammographyMass ScreeningMexican AmericansMiddle AgedOdds RatioPapanicolaou TestSelf ReportSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID27513995
PMCPMC4993116
OpenAlexW2488128890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.