ReviewAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2017
Adult respiratory distress syndrome.
Review in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of corticosteroids in ARDS patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT data.Respiratory research · 2022Pooled it
- Combination of toothbrushing and chlorhexidine compared with exclusive use of chlorhexidine to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review with meta-analysis.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)Pooled it
- Acute bag-valve breathing maneuvers plus manual chest compression is safe during stable septic shock: a randomized clinical trial.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensivaTrial
- Timeline of Multi-Organ Plasma Extravasation After Bleomycin-Induced Acute Lung Injury.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Potential therapeutic effects of interleukin-35 on the differentiation of naïve T cells into HeliosMolecular immunology · 2021Article
- Impact of synthetic surfactant CHF5633 with SP-B and SP-C analogues on lung function and inflammation in rabbit model of acute respiratory distress syndrome.Physiological reports · 2021Article
- Predictors and outcomes of acute respiratory failure in hospitalised patients with acute pancreatitis.Frontline gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Pulmonary Edema in COVID-19 Patients: Mechanisms and Treatment Potential.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Chemocentric Informatics Analysis: DexamethasoneACS omega · 2020Article
- [Interhospital transport of patients with ARDS].Der Anaesthesist · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has now been described as a sequela to such diverse conditions as burns, amniotic fluid embolism, acute pancreatitis, trauma, sepsis and damage as a result of elective surgery in general. Patients with ARDS require immediate intubation, with the average patient now being ventilated for between 8 and 11 days. While the acute management of ARDS is conducted by the critical care team, almost any surgical patient can be affected by the condition and we believe that it is important that a broader spectrum of hospital doctors gain an understanding of the nature of the pathology and its current treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.