Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27513727›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2016

Virus Infection of Plants Alters Pollinator Preference: A Payback for Susceptible Hosts?

Simon C Groen, Sanjie Jiang, Alex M Murphy, Nik J Cunniffe, Jack H Westwood, Matthew P Davey, Toby J A Bruce, John C Caulfield, Oliver J Furzer, Alison Reed and 7 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
24.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Arabidopsis research in 2030: Translating the computable plant.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Latent infection ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Advances in understanding the interaction betweenPlant signaling & behavior · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Simon C GroenDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Sanjie JiangDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Alex M MurphyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Nik J CunniffeDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jack H WestwoodDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Matthew P DaveyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Toby J A BruceRothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
John C CaulfieldRothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Oliver J FurzerDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Alison ReedDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Sophie I RobinsonDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth MillerDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Christopher N DavisDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
John A PickettRothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Heather M WhitneyUniversity of Bristol, School of Biological Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Beverley J GloverDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
John P CarrDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
University of Cambridge · GBRothamsted Research · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J011762/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant volatiles play important roles in attraction of certain pollinators and in host location by herbivorous insects. Virus infection induces changes in plant volatile emission profiles, and this can make plants more attractive to insect herbivores, such as aphids, that act as viral vectors. However, it is unknown if virus-induced alterations in volatile production affect plant-pollinator interactions. We found that volatiles emitted by cucumber mosaic virus (CMV)-infected tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and Arabidopsis thaliana plants altered the foraging behaviour of bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). Virus-induced quantitative and qualitative changes in blends of volatile organic compounds emitted by tomato plants were identified by gas chromatography-coupled mass spectrometry. Experiments with a CMV mutant unable to express the 2b RNA silencing suppressor protein and with Arabidopsis silencing mutants implicate microRNAs in regulating emission of pollinator-perceivable volatiles. In tomato, CMV infection made plants emit volatiles attractive to bumblebees. Bumblebees pollinate tomato by 'buzzing' (sonicating) the flowers, which releases pollen and enhances self-fertilization and seed production as well as pollen export. Without buzz-pollination, CMV infection decreased seed yield, but when flowers of mock-inoculated and CMV-infected plants were buzz-pollinated, the increased seed yield for CMV-infected plants was similar to that for mock-inoculated plants. Increased pollinator preference can potentially increase plant reproductive success in two ways: i) as female parents, by increasing the probability that ovules are fertilized; ii) as male parents, by increasing pollen export. Mathematical modeling suggested that over a wide range of conditions in the wild, these increases to the number of offspring of infected susceptible plants resulting from increased pollinator preference could outweigh underlying strong selection pressures favoring pathogen resistance, allowing genes for disease susceptibility to persist in plant populations. We speculate that enhanced pollinator service for infected individuals in wild plant populations might provide mutual benefits to the virus and its susceptible hosts.

Indexed as

CucumovirusAnimalsArabidopsisBeesFeeding BehaviorGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryModels, TheoreticalPlant DiseasesPollinationSolanum lycopersicumVolatile Organic CompoundsVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID27513727
PMCPMC4981420
OpenAlexW2507706804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.