ArticlePLoS pathogens2016
Virus Infection of Plants Alters Pollinator Preference: A Payback for Susceptible Hosts?
Article in PLoS pathogens, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- Viral manipulation of vector behaviour: cucumber mosaic virus has differential effects on specialist versus generalist aphids infesting Arabidopsis thaliana.Virology journal · 2026Article
- Evolutionary Systems Biology Identifies Genetic Trade-offs in Rice Defense against Aboveground and Belowground Attackers.Plant & cell physiology · 2025Article
- Leaf Size Determines Damage- and Herbivore-Induced Volatile Emissions in Maize.Plant, cell & environment · 2025Article
- Arabidopsis research in 2030: Translating the computable plant.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Dancing with the enemy: symbiotic relationships between plant RNA viruses and their hosts.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Latent infection ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Advances in understanding the interaction betweenPlant signaling & behavior · 2024Review
- Enhancing aphid resistance in horticultural crops: a breeding prospective.Horticulture research · 2024Article
- Variations in the expression of odorant binding and chemosensory proteins in the developmental stages of whitefly Bemisia tabaci Asia II-1.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Reduction in vertical transmission rate of bean common mosaic virus in bee-pollinated common bean plants.Virology journal · 2024Article
- Engineered Resistance to Tobamoviruses.Viruses · 2024Review
- Strawberry varieties differ in pollinator-relevant floral traits.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Agricultural soil legacy influences multitrophic interactions between crops, their pathogens and pollinators.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Bumblebee responses to variation in pollinator-attracting traits ofEcology and evolution · 2023Article
- Ecological Strategies for Resource Use by Three Bromoviruses in Anthropic and Wild Plant Communities.Viruses · 2023Article
- Review
- Lessons from Chloroviruses: the Complex and Diverse Roles of Viruses in Food Webs.Journal of virology · 2023Review
- Chemosensory protein regulates the behavioural response of Frankliniella intonsa and Frankliniella occidentalis to tomato zonate spot virus-Infected pepper (Capsicum annuum).PLoS pathogens · 2023Article
- Dynamic environmental interactions shaped by vegetative plant volatiles.Natural product reports · 2023Review
- Induction of aphid resistance in tobacco by the cucumber mosaic virus CMV∆2b mutant is jasmonate-dependent.Molecular plant pathology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Plant volatiles play important roles in attraction of certain pollinators and in host location by herbivorous insects. Virus infection induces changes in plant volatile emission profiles, and this can make plants more attractive to insect herbivores, such as aphids, that act as viral vectors. However, it is unknown if virus-induced alterations in volatile production affect plant-pollinator interactions. We found that volatiles emitted by cucumber mosaic virus (CMV)-infected tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and Arabidopsis thaliana plants altered the foraging behaviour of bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). Virus-induced quantitative and qualitative changes in blends of volatile organic compounds emitted by tomato plants were identified by gas chromatography-coupled mass spectrometry. Experiments with a CMV mutant unable to express the 2b RNA silencing suppressor protein and with Arabidopsis silencing mutants implicate microRNAs in regulating emission of pollinator-perceivable volatiles. In tomato, CMV infection made plants emit volatiles attractive to bumblebees. Bumblebees pollinate tomato by 'buzzing' (sonicating) the flowers, which releases pollen and enhances self-fertilization and seed production as well as pollen export. Without buzz-pollination, CMV infection decreased seed yield, but when flowers of mock-inoculated and CMV-infected plants were buzz-pollinated, the increased seed yield for CMV-infected plants was similar to that for mock-inoculated plants. Increased pollinator preference can potentially increase plant reproductive success in two ways: i) as female parents, by increasing the probability that ovules are fertilized; ii) as male parents, by increasing pollen export. Mathematical modeling suggested that over a wide range of conditions in the wild, these increases to the number of offspring of infected susceptible plants resulting from increased pollinator preference could outweigh underlying strong selection pressures favoring pathogen resistance, allowing genes for disease susceptibility to persist in plant populations. We speculate that enhanced pollinator service for infected individuals in wild plant populations might provide mutual benefits to the virus and its susceptible hosts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.