Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27513360›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2016

Dimensions and Role-Specific Mediators of Surrogate Trust in the ICU.

Paul J Hutchison, Katie McLaughlin, Tom Corbridge, Kelly N Michelson, Linda Emanuel, Peter H S Sporn, Megan Crowley-Matoka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. A New Process Model for Relationship-Centred Shared Decision-Making in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Settings.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paul J Hutchison1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL.2Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.3Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.4Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.5Buehler Center on Aging, Health & Society, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.6Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.7Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Katie McLaughlin
Tom Corbridge
Kelly N Michelson
Linda Emanuel
Peter H S Sporn
Megan Crowley-Matoka

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Training Program In Lung SciencesT32HL076139 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KAREN M RIDGE, Jacob I Sznajder · 2004 to 2026
$9.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL076139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn the ICU, discussions between clinicians and surrogate decision makers are often accompanied by conflict about a patient's prognosis or care plan. Trust plays a role in limiting conflict, but little is known about the determinants of trust in the ICU. We sought to identify the dimensions of trust and clinician behaviors conducive to trust formation in the ICU.

designProspective qualitative study.

settingMedical ICU of a major urban university hospital. SUBJECTS: Surrogate decision makers of intubated, mechanically ventilated patients in the medical ICU. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsSemistructured interviews focused on surrogates' general experiences in the ICU and on their trust in the clinicians caring for the patient. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded by two reviewers. Constant comparison was used to identify themes pertaining to trust. Thirty surrogate interviews revealed five dimensions of trust in ICU clinicians: technical competence, communication, honesty, benevolence, and interpersonal skills. Most surrogates emphasized the role of nurses in trust formation, frequently citing their technical competence. Trust in physicians was most commonly related to honesty and the quality of their communication with surrogates.

conclusionsInterventions to improve trust in the ICU should be role-specific, since surrogate expectations are different for physicians and nurses with regard to behaviors relevant to trust. Further research is needed to confirm our findings and explore the impact of trust modification on clinician-family conflict.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsThird-Party ConsentTrustAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsProspective StudiesProxyQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID27513360
PMCPMC5219932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.