Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27512996›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Incidence of X and Y Chromosomal Aneuploidy in a Large Child Bearing Population.

Carole Samango-Sprouse, Eser Kırkızlar, Megan P Hall, Patrick Lawson, Zachary Demko, Susan M Zneimer, Kirsten J Curnow, Susan Gross, Andrea Gropman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
28.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Satellite DNAs and human sex chromosome variation.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carole Samango-SprouseDepartment of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, D.C., United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9941-0568
Eser KırkızlarNatera Inc., San Carlos, California, United States of America.
Megan P HallNatera Inc., San Carlos, California, United States of America.
Patrick LawsonThe Focus Foundation, Davidsonville, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0256-2050
Zachary DemkoNatera Inc., San Carlos, California, United States of America.
Susan M ZneimerNatera Inc., San Carlos, California, United States of America.
Kirsten J CurnowNatera Inc., San Carlos, California, United States of America.
Susan GrossNatera Inc., San Carlos, California, United States of America.
Andrea GropmanDepartment of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Natera (United States) · USChildren's National · USGeorge Washington University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundX&Y chromosomal aneuploidies are among the most common human whole-chromosomal copy number changes, but the population-based incidence and prevalence in the child-bearing population is unclear.

methodsThis retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data leveraged a routine non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) using parental genotyping to estimate the population-based incidence of X&Y chromosome variations in this population referred for NIPT (generally due to advanced maternal age).

resultsFrom 141,916 women and 29,336 men, 119 X&Y chromosomal abnormalities (prevalence: 1 in 1,439) were identified. Maternal findings include: 43 cases of 45,X (40 mosaic); 30 cases of 47,XXX (12 mosaic); 3 cases of 46,XX uniparental disomy; 2 cases of 46,XY/46,XX; 23 cases of mosaicism of unknown type; 2 cases of 47,XX,i(X)(q10). Paternal findings include: 2 cases of 47,XXY (1 mosaic); 10 cases of 47,XYY (1 mosaic); 4 partial Y deletions.

conclusionsSingle chromosome aneuploidy was present in one of every 1,439 individuals considered in this study, showing 47,XXX; 47,XX,i(X)(q10); 47,XYY; 47,XXY, partial Y deletions, and a high level of mosaicism for 45,X. This expands significantly our understanding of X&Y chromosomal variations and fertility issues, and is critical for families and adults affected by these disorders. This current and extensive information on fertility will be beneficial for genetic counseling on prenatal diagnoses as well as for newly diagnosed postnatal cases.

Indexed as

AneuploidyAdultChildChromosomes, Human, XChromosomes, Human, YFemaleGenotypeHumansIncidenceMaleMaternal AgeMosaicismPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisProspective StudiesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID27512996
PMCPMC4981345
OpenAlexW2511662368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.