Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27512876›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2016

A new automatic blood pressure kit auscultates for accurate reading with a smartphone: A diagnostic accuracy study.

Hongjun Wu, Bingjian Wang, Xinpu Zhu, Guang Chu, Zhi Zhang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03209024 (App Documentation of Electronic BP Readings in Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03209024 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

App Documentation of Electronic BP Readings in Hypertension

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke-NUS Graduate Medical SchoolRan2017 to 2017Enrolled80ConditionsHypertensionArmsHandwritten logbook recording of home blood pressure readings, Smartphone assisted wireless recording of home blood pressure readings
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hongjun WuDepartment of Cardiology, Yixing No. 2 People's Hospital Department of Cardiology, Huai'an First People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Department of Neurology, Branch of Shanghai General Hospital Department of Cardiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Bingjian Wang
Xinpu Zhu
Guang Chu
Zhi Zhang
American National Standards Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widely used oscillometric automated blood pressure (BP) monitor was continuously questioned on its accuracy. A novel BP kit named Accutension which adopted Korotkoff auscultation method was then devised. Accutension worked with a miniature microphone, a pressure sensor, and a smartphone. The BP values were automatically displayed on the smartphone screen through the installed App. Data recorded in the phone could be played back and reconfirmed after measurement. They could also be uploaded and saved to the iCloud. The accuracy and consistency of this novel electronic auscultatory sphygmomanometer was preliminarily verified here. Thirty-two subjects were included and 82 qualified readings were obtained. The mean differences ± SD for systolic and diastolic BP readings between Accutension and mercury sphygmomanometer were 0.87 ± 2.86 and -0.94 ± 2.93 mm Hg. Agreements between Accutension and mercury sphygmomanometer were highly significant for systolic (ICC = 0.993, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.989-0.995) and diastolic (ICC = 0.987, 95% CI: 0.979-0.991). In conclusion, Accutension worked accurately based on our pilot study data. The difference was acceptable. ICC and Bland-Altman plot charts showed good agreements with manual measurements. Systolic readings of Accutension were slightly higher than those of manual measurement, while diastolic readings were slightly lower. One possible reason was that Accutension captured the first and the last korotkoff sound more sensitively than human ear during manual measurement and avoided sound missing, so that it might be more accurate than traditional mercury sphygmomanometer. By documenting and analyzing of variant tendency of BP values, Accutension helps management of hypertension and therefore contributes to the mobile heath service.

Indexed as

SmartphoneAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAuscultationBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryBlood Pressure MonitorsFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27512876
PMCPMC4985331
OpenAlexW2518650215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.