ArticleObstetric medicine2015
Antenatal haemoglobinopathy screening: Patterns within a large obstetric service. Working towards a standard of care.
Article in Obstetric medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntenatal screening can predict clinically significant haemoglobinopathies, however in Australia, practices are not standardised and are evolving as the population becomes more ethnically diverse. This study describes antenatal screening practices in a large Australian laboratory/antenatal service.
methodsData were collected retrospectively on consecutive antenatal haemoglobin electrophoresis over 16 months and correlated with obstetric data, obtained from the local obstetric database.
results462 patients were included, with an average gestation of 25.8 weeks. 'Pregnancy' was the most common stated indication, with absent indication/clinical information in 8%. Gestational age was documented in 54%. In 15%, no contact details of the referrer were documented and partner screening was traceable in only 25 cases (5.4%). In 82% of cases, no abnormalities were detected. Beta thalassemia trait was the most common positive result. Only 52% of patients had recent iron studies. The mean haemoglobin was 111.6 g/L and mean cell volume was 80.5 fl at the time of testing. Ethnicity was documented on the request form in 3%. After Australasia, the most common ethnicity of patients was South East Asia and the Middle East.
conclusionReferral patterns in our health service are diverse and reflect our changing population and care practices. Detailed guidelines are required and we propose a comprehensive algorithm for general use where selective screening is practiced within an Australasian population or one with similar demographics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.