ArticleObstetric medicine2015
All that wheezes is not asthma: A cautionary case study of shortness of breath in pregnancy.
Article in Obstetric medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determining the Clinical Course of Asthma in Pregnancy.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2022Article
- Putting the world to rights.Obstetric medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShortness of breath is a common physiological pregnancy presentation, secondary to both hormonal and mechanical effects. Its pathological causes are common (asthma exacerbation or infection); new-onset cardiac pathology is rarely considered. CASE: JC, a 39-year old G4P2T1, presented at 34 weeks' gestation with shortness of breath unrelieved by salbutamol. History included asthma, poly-drug abuse and smoking. Initial presentation was consistent with asthma exacerbation and she was treated as such. There was deterioration of symptoms and on re-examination raised jugular venous pressure was noted with bibasal lung crepitations and cardiac systolic murmur. Echocardiogram showed severe cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction 20%). JC was commenced on diuretics, digoxin and fluid restricted. Labour was induced at 35 weeks' gestation, with birth of a healthy female infant (BW 2475 g) by elective assisted vaginal delivery. Cardiac function improved in subsequent weeks, confirming peripartum cardiomyopathy.
conclusionPeripartum cardiomyopathy affects 1 in 2500-4000 live births. Over 90% of women regain normal cardiac function postpartum with optimal medical management. Peripartum cardiomyopathy presents a diagnostic conundrum as its primary symptoms mimic not only those of normal pregnancy but also a number of other, more common conditions. It is important to consider cardiac causes of shortness of breath initially, and vital to revisit an initial non-cardiac shortness of breath diagnosis if there is no sustained improvement with treatment. In this case, asthma history and initial wheeze on examination impeded correct diagnosis; however, the situation was re-evaluated and correct diagnosis made when the patient's shortness of breath deteriorated. Subsequent multidisciplinary management and birth in an appropriate setting facilitated the best outcome for both mother and baby.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.