ReviewObstetric medicine2014
Renal stones in pregnancy.
Review in Obstetric medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maternal kidney adaptation and function in pregnancy: review and perspectives.Function (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Labor and Delivery Complications in Women With Renal Calculi: Increased Risk and Prolonged Hospital Stay.Cureus · 2026Article
- Ureteroscopy for Urolithiasis in Pregnancy: Outcomes of a Multicentre Study on Behalf of the European Association of Urology Section of Endourology.European urology open science · 2025Article
- The role of pharmacological interventions in managing urological complications during pregnancy and childbirth: A review.Medicine · 2025Review
- Ureteroscopic lithotripsy of ureteric stone using thulium fiber laser in a pregnant patient, case report.Urology case reports · 2023Article
- Typical course of cystinuria leading to untypical complications in pregnancy: A case report and review of literature.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Management of Kidney Stone Disease in Pregnancy: A Practical and Evidence-Based Approach.Current urology reports · 2022Review
- Dietary Intake and Genetic Background Influence Vitamin Needs during Pregnancy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Detection of distal ureteral stones in pregnancy using transvaginal ultrasound.Journal of ultrasound · 2021Article
- Catastrophic complications of urolithiasis in pregnancy.BMJ case reports · 2021Article
- Contemporary best practice urolithiasis in pregnancy.Therapeutic advances in urology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnosis and treatment of renal stones during pregnancy is a complex problem. Risks to the fetus from ionising radiation and interventional procedures need to be balanced with optimising clinical care for the mother. Management of such patients requires a clear understanding of available options, with a multidisciplinary team approach. In this review, we discuss the role of different diagnostic tests including ultrasound, magnetic resonance urography, and computerized tomography. We also provide an update on recent developments in the treatment of renal stones during pregnancy. Expectant management remains first-line treatment. Where definitive treatment of the stone is required, new evidence suggests that ureteroscopic stone removal may be equally safe, and possibly better than traditional temporising procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.