Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27512343›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2016

An evidence-based laparoscopic simulation curriculum shortens the clinical learning curve and reduces surgical adverse events.

Gunter De Win, Siska Van Bruwaene, Jyotsna Kulkarni, Ben Van Calster, Rajesh Aggarwal, Christopher Allen, Ann Lissens, Dirk De Ridder, Marc Miserez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Competency-Based Simulation Training for Procedural Skills: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gunter De WinDepartment of Urology, Antwerp University Hospital; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp.
Siska Van BruwaeneDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals of KU Leuven; Centre for Surgical Technologies, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jyotsna KulkarniKulkarni Endo Surgery Institute, Pune, India.
Ben Van CalsterDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Rajesh AggarwalDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine; Steinberg Centre for Simulation and Interactive Learning, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Christopher AllenSchool of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ann LissensCentre for Surgical Technologies, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Dirk De RidderDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals of KU Leuven.
Marc MiserezCentre for Surgical Technologies, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical simulation is becoming increasingly important in surgical education. However, the method of simulation to be incorporated into a surgical curriculum is unclear. We compared the effectiveness of a proficiency-based preclinical simulation training in laparoscopy with conventional surgical training and conventional surgical training interspersed with standard simulation sessions. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective single-blinded trial, 30 final-year medical students were randomized into three groups, which differed in the way they were exposed to laparoscopic simulation training. The control group received only clinical training during residency, whereas the interval group received clinical training in combination with simulation training. The Center for Surgical Technologies Preclinical Training Program (CST PTP) group received a proficiency-based preclinical simulation course during the final year of medical school but was not exposed to any extra simulation training during surgical residency. After 6 months of surgical residency, the influence on the learning curve while performing five consecutive human laparoscopic cholecystectomies was evaluated with motion tracking, time, Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills, and number of adverse events (perforation of gall bladder, bleeding, and damage to liver tissue).

resultsThe odds of adverse events were 4.5 (95% confidence interval 1.3-15.3) and 3.9 (95% confidence interval 1.5-9.7) times lower for the CST PTP group compared with the control and interval groups. For raw time, corrected time, movements, path length, and Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills, the CST PTP trainees nearly always started at a better level and were never outperformed by the other trainees.

conclusionProficiency-based preclinical training has a positive impact on the learning curve of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and diminishes adverse events.

Indexed as

laparoscopylearning curvesimulationtransfer of skills

Identifiers

PMID27512343
PMCPMC4962760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.