Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27512241›Full record

ArticleFunctional ecology2016

Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide alters the interactions between bumblebees and wild plants.

Dara A Stanley, Nigel E Raine

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Functional ecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
34.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Past insecticide exposure reduces bee reproduction and population growth rate.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The Power ofFrontiers in physiology · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Dara A StanleySchool of Biological Sciences Royal Holloway University of London Egham TW20 0EX UK; Botany and Plant Science School of Natural Sciences and Ryan Institute National University of Ireland Galway Ireland.
Nigel E RaineSchool of Biological Sciences Royal Holloway University of London Egham TW20 0EX UK; School of Environmental Sciences University of Guelph Guelph ON N1G 2W1 Canada.
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IERoyal Holloway University of London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect pollinators are essential for both the production of a large proportion of world crops and the health of natural ecosystems. As important pollinators, bumblebees must learn to forage on flowers to feed both themselves and provision their colonies.Increased use of pesticides has caused concern over sublethal effects on bees, such as impacts on reproduction or learning ability. However, little is known about how sublethal exposure to field-realistic levels of pesticide might affect the ability of bees to visit and manipulate flowers.We observed the behaviour of individual bumblebees from colonies chronically exposed to a neonicotinoid pesticide (10 ppb thiamethoxam) or control solutions foraging for the first time on an array of morphologically complex wildflowers (

Indexed as

bumble bee Bombus terrestrisecotoxicologyflower visitationforaging behaviourinsecticidepollenpollinator declines

Identifiers

PMID27512241
PMCPMC4950133
OpenAlexW2304869387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.