Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27512156›Full record

ArticleAustralian journal of chemistry2015

Steven H Liang, Neil Vasdev

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian journal of chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Automated light-induced synthesis ofScientific reports · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. FacileNature protocols · 2019
    Article
  6. Chemistry for Positron Emission Tomography: Recent Advances inAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
  8. A catalytic fluoride-rebound mechanism for C(spScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2017
    Article
  9. [Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2017
    Article
  10. Development of Customized [Scientific reports · 2017
    Article
  11. Radiolabeling with [Nuclear medicine and biology
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Steven H LiangDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital & Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Neil VasdevDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital & Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

New PET tracers for neuroimaging of FAAH in endocannabinoid signalingK01DA038000 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LIANG, STEVEN H · 2014 to 2018
$927k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA038000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The logic of total synthesis transformed a stagnant state of medicinal and synthetic organic chemistry when there was a paucity of methods and reagents to synthesize drug molecules and/or natural products. Molecular imaging by positron emission tomography (PET) is now experiencing a renaissance in the way radiopharmaceuticals for molecular imaging are synthesized, however, a paradigm shift is desperately needed in the discovery pipeline to accelerate in vivo imaging studies. A significant challenge in radiochemistry is the limited choice of labeled reagents (or building blocks) available for the synthesis of novel radiopharmaceuticals with the most commonly used short-lived radionuclides carbon-11 (

Identifiers

PMID27512156
PMCPMC4976501
OpenAlexW2146678566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.