Trial reportCirculation. Heart failure2016
Differential Response to Low-Dose Dopamine or Low-Dose Nesiritide in Acute Heart Failure With Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: Results From the ROSE AHF Trial (Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure).
Trial report in Circulation. Heart failure, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01132846 (Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure and Reliable Evaluation of Dyspnea in the Heart Failure Network ROSE Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure and Reliable Evaluation of Dyspnea in the Heart Failure Network ROSE Study
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy of different drugs in acute heart failure with renal dysfunction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with chronic kidney disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Nesiritide in patients with acute myocardial infarction and heart failure: a meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Pooled it
- Lower urine sodium predicts longer length of stay in acute heart failure patients: Insights from the ROSE AHF trial.Clinical cardiology · 2020Trial
- Venous vascular pharmacology: how does it contribute to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2026Review
- Neurohormonal Effects of Intravenous Dopamine in Patients with Acute Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Diuretic Treatment in Heart Failure: A Practical Guide for Clinicians.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Inotropic Agents: Are We Still in the Middle of Nowhere?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Diuretic Combination Therapy in Acute Heart Failure: An Updated Review.Current pharmaceutical design · 2024Review
- Congestion in Heart Failure: From the Secret of a Mummy to Today's Novel Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- New Insight in Cardiorenal Syndrome: From Biomarkers to Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Evolving therapeutic strategies for patients hospitalized with new or worsening heart failure across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction.Clinical cardiology · 2022Review
- Efficacy of Nondiuretic Pharmacotherapy for Improving the Treatment of Congestion in Patients with Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- The dopamine transporter gene SLC6A3: multidisease risks.Molecular psychiatry · 2022Article
- Compensatory post-diuretic renal sodium reabsorption is not a dominant mechanism of diuretic resistance in acute heart failure.European heart journal · 2021Article
- Effect of aggressive diuresis in acute heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
- Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Approaches to Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.Circulation research · 2021Review
- Medical management of acute heart failure.Faculty reviews · 2021Review
- Contemporary Management of Severe Acute Kidney Injury and Refractory Cardiorenal Syndrome: JACC Council Perspectives.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2020Review
- An Update on the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Cardiorenal Syndrome.Cardiology research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe ROSE AHF trial (Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure) found that when compared with placebo, neither low-dose dopamine (2 µg/kg per minute) nor low-dose nesiritide (0.005 μg/kg per minute without bolus) enhanced decongestion or preserved renal function in AHF patients with renal dysfunction. However, there may be differential responses to vasoactive agents in AHF patients with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction (EF). This post hoc analysis examined potential interaction between treatment effect and EF (EF ≤40% versus >40%) on the ROSE AHF end points. METHODS AND
resultsROSE AHF enrolled AHF patients (n=360; any EF) with renal dysfunction. The coprimary end points were cumulative urine volume and the change in serum cystatin-C in 72 hours. The effect of dopamine (interaction P=0.001) and nesiritide (interaction P=0.039) on urine volume varied by EF group. In heart failure with reduced EF, urine volume was higher with active treatment versus placebo, whereas in heart failure with preserved EF, urine volume was lower with active treatment. The effect of dopamine and nesiritide on weight change, sodium excretion, and incidence of AHF treatment failure also varied by EF group (interaction P<0.05 for all). There was no interaction between vasoactive treatment's effect and EF on change in cystatin-C. Compared with placebo, dopamine was associated with improved clinical outcomes in heart failure with reduced EF and worse clinical outcomes in heart failure with preserved EF. With nesiritide, there were no differences in clinical outcomes when compared with placebo in both heart failure with reduced EF and heart failure with preserved EF.
conclusionsIn this post hoc analysis of ROSE AHF, the response to vasoactive therapies differed in patients with heart failure with reduced EF and heart failure with preserved EF. Investigations of AHF therapies should assess the potential for differential responses in AHF with preserved versus reduced EF. CLINICAL
trial registrationURL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01132846.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.