Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27512021›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Contextual processing in unpredictable auditory environments: the limited resource model of auditory refractoriness in the rhesus.

Tobias Teichert, Kate Gurnsey, Dean Salisbury, Robert A Sweet

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tobias TeichertDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; teichert@pitt.edu.
Kate GurnseyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Dean SalisburyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Robert A SweetDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Plasticity of Auditory Cortical Circuits in SchizophreniaR01MH071533 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SWEET, ROBERT A · 2004 to 2018
$6.9M
Mismatch Negativity and Complex Second-Order Sensory Memory in SchizophreniaR01MH094328 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SALISBURY, DEAN F · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
Neural networks of auditory refractoriness and mismatch generation in the rhesus macaqueR21MH113041 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TEICHERT, TOBIAS · 2017 to 2018
$425k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH071533NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094328NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH113041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory refractoriness refers to the finding of smaller electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to tones preceded by shorter periods of silence. To date, its physiological mechanisms remain unclear, limiting the insights gained from findings of abnormal refractoriness in individuals with schizophrenia. To resolve this roadblock, we studied auditory refractoriness in the rhesus, one of the most important animal models of auditory function, using grids of up to 32 chronically implanted cranial EEG electrodes. Four macaques passively listened to sounds whose identity and timing was random, thus preventing animals from forming valid predictions about upcoming sounds. Stimulus onset asynchrony ranged between 0.2 and 12.8 s, thus encompassing the clinically relevant timescale of refractoriness. Our results show refractoriness in all 8 previously identified middle- and long-latency components that peaked between 14 and 170 ms after tone onset. Refractoriness may reflect the formation and gradual decay of a basic sensory memory trace that may be mirrored by the expenditure and gradual recovery of a limited physiological resource that determines generator excitability. For all 8 components, results were consistent with the assumption that processing of each tone expends ∼65% of the available resource. Differences between components are caused by how quickly the resource recovers. Recovery time constants of different components ranged between 0.5 and 2 s. This work provides a solid conceptual, methodological, and computational foundation to dissect the physiological mechanisms of auditory refractoriness in the rhesus. Such knowledge may, in turn, help develop novel pharmacological, mechanism-targeted interventions.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionElectrodes, ImplantedElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryMacaca mulattaMaleRandom AllocationRefractory Period, Electrophysiologicalauditory deficitsEEGhabituationresponse suppressionrhesus

Identifiers

PMID27512021
PMCPMC5102310
OpenAlexW2495109019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.