ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016
Contextual processing in unpredictable auditory environments: the limited resource model of auditory refractoriness in the rhesus.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complementary functional profiles of mismatch responses mediated by adaptation and deviance detection point to two distinct auditory short-term memory systems.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Volumetric mesoscopic electrophysiology: a new imaging modality for the nonhuman primate.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Influence of inter-stimulus interval on 40-Hz auditory steady-state response in patients with schizophrenia.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Intensity and inter-stimulus-interval effects on human middle- and long-latency auditory evoked potentials in an unpredictable auditory context.Psychophysiology · 2023Article
- A Linear Superposition Model of Envelope and Frequency Following Responses May Help Identify Generators Based on Latency.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022Article
- Cross-population coupling of neural activity based on Gaussian process current source densities.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- A surface metric and software toolbox for EEG electrode grids in the macaque.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2020Article
- Formation and decay of auditory short-term memory in the macaque monkey.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- A putative electrophysiological biomarker of auditory sensory memory encoding is sensitive to pharmacological alterations of excitatory/inhibitory balance in male macaque monkeys.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2018Article
- Loudness- and time-dependence of auditory evoked potentials is blunted by the NMDA channel blocker MK-801.Psychiatry research · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Auditory refractoriness refers to the finding of smaller electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to tones preceded by shorter periods of silence. To date, its physiological mechanisms remain unclear, limiting the insights gained from findings of abnormal refractoriness in individuals with schizophrenia. To resolve this roadblock, we studied auditory refractoriness in the rhesus, one of the most important animal models of auditory function, using grids of up to 32 chronically implanted cranial EEG electrodes. Four macaques passively listened to sounds whose identity and timing was random, thus preventing animals from forming valid predictions about upcoming sounds. Stimulus onset asynchrony ranged between 0.2 and 12.8 s, thus encompassing the clinically relevant timescale of refractoriness. Our results show refractoriness in all 8 previously identified middle- and long-latency components that peaked between 14 and 170 ms after tone onset. Refractoriness may reflect the formation and gradual decay of a basic sensory memory trace that may be mirrored by the expenditure and gradual recovery of a limited physiological resource that determines generator excitability. For all 8 components, results were consistent with the assumption that processing of each tone expends ∼65% of the available resource. Differences between components are caused by how quickly the resource recovers. Recovery time constants of different components ranged between 0.5 and 2 s. This work provides a solid conceptual, methodological, and computational foundation to dissect the physiological mechanisms of auditory refractoriness in the rhesus. Such knowledge may, in turn, help develop novel pharmacological, mechanism-targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.