Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27511620›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2016

Value of corneal epithelial and Bowman's layer vertical thickness profiles generated by UHR-OCT for sub-clinical keratoconus diagnosis.

Zhe Xu, Jun Jiang, Chun Yang, Shenghai Huang, Mei Peng, Weibo Li, Lele Cui, Jianhua Wang, Fan Lu, Meixiao Shen

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. [Early diagnosis of keratoconus].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhe XuSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jun JiangSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Chun YangSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Shenghai HuangSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Mei PengSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Weibo LiSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Lele CuiSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jianhua WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Fan LuSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Meixiao ShenSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultra-high resolution optical coherence tomography (UHR-OCT) can image the corneal epithelium and Bowman's layer and measurement the thicknesses. The purpose of this study was to validate the diagnostic power of vertical thickness profiles of the corneal epithelium and Bowman's layer imaged by UHR-OCT in the diagnosis of sub-clinical keratoconus (KC). Each eye of 37 KC patients, asymptomatic fellow eyes of 32 KC patients, and each eye of 81 normal subjects were enrolled. Vertical thickness profiles of the corneal epithelium and Bowman's layer were measured by UHR-OCT. Diagnostic indices were calculated from vertical thickness profiles of each layer and output values of discriminant functions based on individual indices. Receiver operating characteristic curves were determined, and the accuracy of the diagnostic indices were assessed as the area under the curves (AUC). Among all of the individual indices, the maximum ectasia index for epithelium had the highest ability to discriminate sub-clinical KC from normal corneas (AUC = 0.939). The discriminant function containing maximum ectasia indices of epithelium and Bowman's layer further increased the AUC value (AUC = 0.970) for sub-clinical KC diagnosis. UHR-OCT-derived thickness indices from the entire vertical thickness profiles of the corneal epithelium and Bowman's layer can provide valuable diagnostic references to detect sub-clinical KC.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBowman MembraneEpithelium, CornealFemaleHumansKeratoconusMale

Identifiers

PMID27511620
PMCPMC4980663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.