Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27511379›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2017

Knowledge of pelvic floor problems: a study of third trimester, primiparous women.

Aideen T O'Neill, Joanne Hockey, Patrick O'Brien, Amanda Williams, Tim P Morris, Tahira Khan, Emma Hardwick, Wai Yoong

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Awareness of urinary incontinence in pregnant women as a neglected issue: a cross-sectional study.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aideen T O'NeillDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, Sterling Way, London, N18 1QX, UK. aideen.oneill@nhs.net.
Joanne HockeyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Free London NHS Trust, London, UK.
Patrick O'BrienUniversity College London Hospital and The Portland Hospital for Women and Children, London, UK.
Amanda WilliamsDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Tim P MorrisHub for Trials Methodology Research, MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Tahira KhanUCL Medical School, Gower Street, London, UK.
Emma HardwickDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Free London NHS Trust, London, UK.
Wai YoongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, Sterling Way, London, N18 1QX, UK.
University College London · GBNorth Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisPelvic floor problems in women (urinary incontinence, faecal incontinence, uterovaginal prolapse) are common, and have an adverse effect on quality of life. We hypothesized that there is low knowledge of these problems amongst primiparous women in their third trimester of pregnancy.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study in antenatal clinics of three hospitals in London, UK, from 2011 to 2013. Primiparous women aged ≥18 years and in the third trimester of pregnancy answered questions on pelvic floor problems. Knowledge scores were calculated based on the proportion of questions answered correctly.

resultsA total of 249 women completed the question set. The average knowledge score across all domains was low at 45 %. Scores were lowest for the less common problems of faecal incontinence (35 %) and prolapse (36 %). The score for urinary incontinence was higher at 63 %, but low when questions explored more detailed levels of knowledge (41 %). Knowledge scores were positively associated with both education to tertiary level and the use of books as the information source on pregnancy and delivery. Only 35 % of women cited antenatal classes as a source.

conclusionsKnowledge of pelvic floor problems is low amongst third-trimester, primiparous women in this London-based population. Adequate knowledge of these problems is important for women to be able to make informed choices about their antenatal care and to seek help if problems arise. The data suggest scope for health-care professionals to raise these issues early during pregnancy, and to help women access accurate sources of information.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansLondonParityPelvic Floor DisordersPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdPrenatal CareSurveys and QuestionnairesUrinary IncontinenceUterine ProlapseIncontinenceKnowledgePelvic floorPrimiparousProlapse

Identifiers

PMID27511379
OpenAlexW2502627749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.