SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2016
Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06573801 (A Single Centre Randomised Prospective Cross-over Study to Assess Agreement Between Blood Pressure Measurements Taken Using Cuffless Wearable and Cuffed, Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Devices.), which is not on this map. Cited by 477 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Single Centre Randomised Prospective Cross-over Study to Assess Agreement Between Blood Pressure Measurements Taken Using Cuffless Wearable and Cuffed, Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Devices.
Who cites it
477 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Mindfulness based interventions for blood pressure reduction: systematic and umbrella review of existing meta-analyses.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic value of blood pressure variability in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Pooled it
- Association between obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and blood pressure variability: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Guideline
- Effect of amphetamines on blood pressure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of adrenergic agonist oral decongestants on blood pressure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Variability and the Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Pooled it
- Blood pressure variability predicts poor outcomes in acute stroke patients without thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Association of an inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: A meta-analysis of cohort studies.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2023Pooled it
- A remote intervention to improve medication nonadherence guided by a marker of risk derived from the electronic health records of adolescent transplant recipients.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026Trial
- Effects of a 4-Week Multi-Exercise Isometric Resistance Training Programme on Resting and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Normotensive Adults.European journal of sport science · 2026Trial
- How often should self-monitoring of blood pressure be repeated? A secondary analysis of data from two randomized controlled trials.Journal of hypertension · 2025Trial
- Reducing blood pressure variability-results from a single-arm proof of concept prospective trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Diabetes and Previous Stroke: A Post-Hoc Analysis of ACCORD-BP Trial.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Hypotensive Episodes on 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Cognitive Function: Insights From the SPRINT Study.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2025Trial
- Association Between Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertensive Patients: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the SPRINT Trial.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Trial
- Long-term BPV is an Independent Risk Factor for Renal Prognosis in Hypertensive Patients - a Post-hoc Analysis of the SPRINT Study.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Trial
- Effects of dynamic, isometric, and combined resistance training on ambulatory blood pressure in treated men with hypertension: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of human hypertension · 2024Trial
417 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically review studies quantifying the associations of long term (clinic), mid-term (home), and short term (ambulatory) variability in blood pressure, independent of mean blood pressure, with cardiovascular disease events and mortality. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and Web of Science, searched to 15 February 2016 for full text articles in English. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Prospective cohort studies or clinical trials in adults, except those in patients receiving haemodialysis, where the condition may directly impact blood pressure variability. Standardised hazard ratios were extracted and, if there was little risk of confounding, combined using random effects meta-analysis in main analyses. Outcomes included all cause and cardiovascular disease mortality and cardiovascular disease events. Measures of variability included standard deviation, coefficient of variation, variation independent of mean, and average real variability, but not night dipping or day-night variation.
results41 papers representing 19 observational cohort studies and 17 clinical trial cohorts, comprising 46 separate analyses were identified. Long term variability in blood pressure was studied in 24 papers, mid-term in four, and short-term in 15 (two studied both long term and short term variability). Results from 23 analyses were excluded from main analyses owing to high risks of confounding. Increased long term variability in systolic blood pressure was associated with risk of all cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 1.22), cardiovascular disease mortality (1.18, 1.09 to 1.28), cardiovascular disease events (1.18, 1.07 to 1.30), coronary heart disease (1.10, 1.04 to 1.16), and stroke (1.15, 1.04 to 1.27). Increased mid-term and short term variability in daytime systolic blood pressure were also associated with all cause mortality (1.15, 1.06 to 1.26 and 1.10, 1.04 to 1.16, respectively).
conclusionsLong term variability in blood pressure is associated with cardiovascular and mortality outcomes, over and above the effect of mean blood pressure. Associations are similar in magnitude to those of cholesterol measures with cardiovascular disease. Limited data for mid-term and short term variability showed similar associations. Future work should focus on the clinical implications of assessment of variability in blood pressure and avoid the common confounding pitfalls observed to date. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42014015695.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.