Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27511067›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2016

Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sarah L Stevens, Sally Wood, Constantinos Koshiaris, Kathryn Law, Paul Glasziou, Richard J Stevens, Richard J McManus

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06573801 (A Single Centre Randomised Prospective Cross-over Study to Assess Agreement Between Blood Pressure Measurements Taken Using Cuffless Wearable and Cuffed, Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Devices.), which is not on this map. Cited by 477 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
477citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06573801 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Single Centre Randomised Prospective Cross-over Study to Assess Agreement Between Blood Pressure Measurements Taken Using Cuffless Wearable and Cuffed, Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Devices.

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen Mary University of LondonRan2025 to 2025Enrolled48ConditionsBlood PressureArmsAktiia Bracelet, Healthstats BPro Evo, Spacelabs OnTrak Ambulatory Blood Pressure monitor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

477 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Guideline
  5. Effect of amphetamines on blood pressure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  6. Effect of adrenergic agonist oral decongestants on blood pressure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. A remote intervention to improve medication nonadherence guided by a marker of risk derived from the electronic health records of adolescent transplant recipients.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

417 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah L StevensNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK richard.stevens@phc.ox.ac.uk.
Sally WoodNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.
Constantinos KoshiarisNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.
Kathryn LawNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.
Paul GlasziouFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Queensland, Australia.
Richard J StevensNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK richard.stevens@phc.ox.ac.uk.
Richard J McManusNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.

Funding

Department of Health CDF/01/017Department of Health NIHR-RP-02-12-015Department of Health RP-PG-1209-10051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review studies quantifying the associations of long term (clinic), mid-term (home), and short term (ambulatory) variability in blood pressure, independent of mean blood pressure, with cardiovascular disease events and mortality. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and Web of Science, searched to 15 February 2016 for full text articles in English. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Prospective cohort studies or clinical trials in adults, except those in patients receiving haemodialysis, where the condition may directly impact blood pressure variability. Standardised hazard ratios were extracted and, if there was little risk of confounding, combined using random effects meta-analysis in main analyses. Outcomes included all cause and cardiovascular disease mortality and cardiovascular disease events. Measures of variability included standard deviation, coefficient of variation, variation independent of mean, and average real variability, but not night dipping or day-night variation.

results41 papers representing 19 observational cohort studies and 17 clinical trial cohorts, comprising 46 separate analyses were identified. Long term variability in blood pressure was studied in 24 papers, mid-term in four, and short-term in 15 (two studied both long term and short term variability). Results from 23 analyses were excluded from main analyses owing to high risks of confounding. Increased long term variability in systolic blood pressure was associated with risk of all cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 1.22), cardiovascular disease mortality (1.18, 1.09 to 1.28), cardiovascular disease events (1.18, 1.07 to 1.30), coronary heart disease (1.10, 1.04 to 1.16), and stroke (1.15, 1.04 to 1.27). Increased mid-term and short term variability in daytime systolic blood pressure were also associated with all cause mortality (1.15, 1.06 to 1.26 and 1.10, 1.04 to 1.16, respectively).

conclusionsLong term variability in blood pressure is associated with cardiovascular and mortality outcomes, over and above the effect of mean blood pressure. Associations are similar in magnitude to those of cholesterol measures with cardiovascular disease. Limited data for mid-term and short term variability showed similar associations. Future work should focus on the clinical implications of assessment of variability in blood pressure and avoid the common confounding pitfalls observed to date. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42014015695.

Indexed as

Blood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCardiovascular DiseasesCause of DeathHumans

Identifiers

PMID27511067
PMCPMC4979357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.