Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27511020›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Tonotopic Optimization for Temporal Processing in the Cochlear Nucleus.

Stefan N Oline, Go Ashida, R Michael Burger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2022
    Article
  7. Structural and Functional Refinement of the Axon Initial Segment in Avian Cochlear Nucleus during Development.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Postsynaptic FMRP Regulates SynaptogenesisThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  12. Auditory Input Shapes Tonotopic Differentiation of Kv1.1 Expression in Avian Cochlear Nucleus during Late Development.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Your genes decide what you are listening to.Channels (Austin, Tex.) · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefan N OlineDepartment of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, and.ORCID 0000-0002-7094-3800
Go AshidaCluster of Excellence "Hearing4all," Department for Neuroscience, University of Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8886-1213
R Michael BurgerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, and burger@lehigh.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3856-3488
Lehigh University · USCarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DE

Funding

Efferent inhibitory mechanisms in binaural processingR01DC008989 · NIDCD · LEHIGH UNIVERSITY · PI BURGER, R. MICHAEL · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledIn the auditory system, sounds are processed in parallel frequency-tuned circuits, beginning in the cochlea. Auditory nerve fibers reflect this tonotopy and encode temporal properties of acoustic stimuli by "locking" discharges to a particular stimulus phase. However, physiological constraints on phase-locking depend on stimulus frequency. Interestingly, low characteristic frequency (LCF) neurons in the cochlear nucleus improve phase-locking precision relative to their auditory nerve inputs. This is proposed to arise through synaptic integration, but the postsynaptic membrane's selectivity for varying levels of synaptic convergence is poorly understood. The chick cochlear nucleus, nucleus magnocellularis (NM), exhibits tonotopic distribution of both input and membrane properties. LCF neurons receive many small inputs and have low input thresholds, whereas high characteristic frequency (HCF) neurons receive few, large synapses and require larger currents to spike. NM therefore presents an opportunity to study how small membrane variations interact with a systematic topographic gradient of synaptic inputs. We investigated membrane input selectivity and observed that HCF neurons preferentially select faster input than their LCF counterparts, and that this preference is tolerant of changes to membrane voltage. We then used computational models to probe which properties are crucial to phase-locking. The model predicted that the optimal arrangement of synaptic and membrane properties for phase-locking is specific to stimulus frequency and that the tonotopic distribution of input number and membrane excitability in NM closely tracks a stimulus-defined optimum. These findings were then confirmed physiologically with dynamic-clamp simulations of inputs to NM neurons. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: One way that neurons represent temporal information is by phase-locking, which is discharging in response to a particular phase of the stimulus waveform. In the auditory system, central neurons are optimized to retain or improve phase-locking precision compared with input from the auditory nerve. However, the difficulty of this computation varies systematically with stimulus frequency. We examined properties that contribute to temporal processing both physiologically and in a computational model. Neurons processing low-frequency input benefit from integration of many weak inputs, whereas those processing higher frequencies progressively lose precision by integration of multiple inputs. Here, we reveal general features of input-output optimization that apply to all neurons that process time varying input.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAuditory PathwaysChick EmbryoCochlear NucleusComputer SimulationElectric StimulationExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsIn Vitro TechniquesNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesSynaptic Transmissioncochlear nucleusphase-lockingsynaptic convergencetonotopy

Identifiers

PMID27511020
PMCPMC4978807
OpenAlexW2491146427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.