ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016
Tonotopic Optimization for Temporal Processing in the Cochlear Nucleus.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Self-organized spectral adjustment in echolocation sounds within group-flying bats.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026Article
- Avian cochlear nucleus neurons exhibit tonotopic specializations across development.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Conditional mGluR5 knockout in glutamatergic pathways disrupts the development of excitatory synaptic transmission onto mouse MNTB neurons.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Concussion acutely disrupts auditory processing in division I football student-athletes.Brain injury · 2025Article
- Expression and Neurotransmitter Association of the Synaptic Calcium Sensor Synaptotagmin in the Avian Auditory Brain Stem.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2022Article
- Structural and Functional Refinement of the Axon Initial Segment in Avian Cochlear Nucleus during Development.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Tonotopic Differentiation of Coupling between CaiScience · 2019Article
- Dynamics of synaptic extracellular field potentials in the nucleus laminaris of the barn owl.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- Functional Development of Principal Neurons in the Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus Extends Beyond Hearing Onset.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019Article
- Postsynaptic FMRP Regulates SynaptogenesisThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Auditory Input Shapes Tonotopic Differentiation of Kv1.1 Expression in Avian Cochlear Nucleus during Late Development.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- A computational analysis of signal fidelity in the rostral nucleus of the solitary tract.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Article
- Need for Speed and Precision: Structural and Functional Specialization in the Cochlear Nucleus of the Avian Auditory System.Journal of experimental neuroscience · 2018Review
- Diverse Intrinsic Properties Shape Functional Phenotype of Low-Frequency Neurons in the Auditory Brainstem.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018Article
- Intrinsic physiology of inhibitory neurons changes over auditory development.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Article
- Your genes decide what you are listening to.Channels (Austin, Tex.) · 2017Article
- Ion channel mechanisms underlying frequency-firing patterns of the avian nucleus magnocellularis: A computational model.Channels (Austin, Tex.) · 2017Article
- Activity-dependent formation and location of voltage-gated sodium channel clusters at a CNS nerve terminal during postnatal development.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledIn the auditory system, sounds are processed in parallel frequency-tuned circuits, beginning in the cochlea. Auditory nerve fibers reflect this tonotopy and encode temporal properties of acoustic stimuli by "locking" discharges to a particular stimulus phase. However, physiological constraints on phase-locking depend on stimulus frequency. Interestingly, low characteristic frequency (LCF) neurons in the cochlear nucleus improve phase-locking precision relative to their auditory nerve inputs. This is proposed to arise through synaptic integration, but the postsynaptic membrane's selectivity for varying levels of synaptic convergence is poorly understood. The chick cochlear nucleus, nucleus magnocellularis (NM), exhibits tonotopic distribution of both input and membrane properties. LCF neurons receive many small inputs and have low input thresholds, whereas high characteristic frequency (HCF) neurons receive few, large synapses and require larger currents to spike. NM therefore presents an opportunity to study how small membrane variations interact with a systematic topographic gradient of synaptic inputs. We investigated membrane input selectivity and observed that HCF neurons preferentially select faster input than their LCF counterparts, and that this preference is tolerant of changes to membrane voltage. We then used computational models to probe which properties are crucial to phase-locking. The model predicted that the optimal arrangement of synaptic and membrane properties for phase-locking is specific to stimulus frequency and that the tonotopic distribution of input number and membrane excitability in NM closely tracks a stimulus-defined optimum. These findings were then confirmed physiologically with dynamic-clamp simulations of inputs to NM neurons. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: One way that neurons represent temporal information is by phase-locking, which is discharging in response to a particular phase of the stimulus waveform. In the auditory system, central neurons are optimized to retain or improve phase-locking precision compared with input from the auditory nerve. However, the difficulty of this computation varies systematically with stimulus frequency. We examined properties that contribute to temporal processing both physiologically and in a computational model. Neurons processing low-frequency input benefit from integration of many weak inputs, whereas those processing higher frequencies progressively lose precision by integration of multiple inputs. Here, we reveal general features of input-output optimization that apply to all neurons that process time varying input.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.